Undertaking Law

IIRC Undertaking isn't illegal per se (lanes moving faster than other lanes etc). However it can land you in trouble with charges of dangerous driving.

I would argue if pulled over that the driver in the wrong lane is driving without due care and attention. And that it is not a dangerous manoeuvre to undertake them at speed as the hard shoulder is a viable escape route, and crossing two lanes of traffic to move into the fast lane would be more dangerous (in certain circumstances).

The danger is that if you undertake someone (and the person your are undertaking is sitting in the middle lane) you can't rely on them to check their mirror, as if they decide to move over to the inside lane (without them checking the mirrors or blind spot) they are going to hit the side of your car at the moment you are under taking them
 
If you have overtaken Mr Solitary Middle Lane Driver on the left then the only obvious reason you did so was because he must have been in a queue of slower moving traffic or turning right, otherwise they would have been in the inside lane.
 
As far as I was aware, if you approach a car in lane 2, switched to lane 1 to move round them and move back to lane 2, that would be an "overtake on the left", and is a DO NOT in the HC.

If you're in lane 1 doing 70 and pass some numpty doing 60 in lane 2, not chainging lanes, that's just passing slower traffic.

Not that I'd suggest doing either; being passed by people on their left is pretty much unexpected by the typical motorist.
 
The danger is that if you undertake someone (and the person your are undertaking is sitting in the middle lane) you can't rely on them to check their mirror, as if they decide to move over to the inside lane (without them checking the mirrors or blind spot) they are going to hit the side of your car at the moment you are under taking them

True, then again I'm talking from a bikers perspective, I don't drive cars often.
 
yes, moving at a steady 40mph while one lane was clear. Its still undertaking so :rolleyes: at you.

Highway Code 268
Do not overtake on the left or move to a lane on your left to overtake. In congested conditions, where adjacent lanes of traffic are moving at similar speeds, traffic in left-hand lanes may sometimes be moving faster than traffic to the right. In these conditions you may keep up with the traffic in your lane even if this means passing traffic in the lane to your right. Do not weave in and out of lanes to overtake.

:p
 
It is illegal to undertake. They grey area is that (as is common) the law is a bit fuzzy about what "undertaking" means. The view of a couple of Trafpols I know is that to be guilty of undertaking you must have changed lanes to the left in order to pass. If you were already in the left and stayed there then it could reasonably be argued that what you did was not an undertake, but driving in the correct lane. I understand that the mags tend to support this view (assuming it even got that far).

However...

it should be obvious that the sticking point will be: how long were you in the lane to the left of the car you overtook, before you did overtake? A second? Ten? Thirty? The first is clearly undertaking, the last is probably not. On this rests whether you have committed an offence.

M

As I understand it, you need to move left immediately behind someone, pass them on the left and then pull out in (fairly closely) front of them to have actually completed an 'undertake' that would get you prosecuted.

However, I feel that the police should concentrate on prosecuting those who are undertaken, because if it is possible to be undertaken then you are in the wrong ****** lane.
 
IIRC Undertaking isn't illegal per se (lanes moving faster than other lanes etc). However it can land you in trouble with charges of dangerous driving.

I would argue if pulled over that the driver in the wrong lane is driving without due care and attention. And that it is not a dangerous manoeuvre to undertake them at speed as the hard shoulder is a viable escape route, and crossing two lanes of traffic to move into the fast lane would be more dangerous (in certain circumstances).

Since ignorance is no defence in the eyes of the law, could the person being undertaken be prosecuted for aiding and abetting?
 
My general rules of thumb:

1. Only overtake on the left on an otherwise quiet motorway with an obvious Middle Lane Moron - don't move lanes to "undertake" and then swap straight back again to beat the traffic on more congested motorways.

2. Never go past on the left unless there is a hard shoulder, or other get out of jail free route should said MLM decide to suddenly change lanes without warning.

3. Don't do it at big closing speeds.

4. If there is a collision, be prepared to be "frowned upon" by the police.

I do a whole bunch of motorway driving, and haven't had an issue with passing on the left like this, even with a police car in view.
 
Its quite simple, its not hard.

You can pass on the left if you are already in lane and the person on the right is moving slower than you.

There, how hard is that, nobody will get done for dangerous driving, traffic police dont view it as dodgy, its a simple to understand rule.

It applies on dual carriage ways, and on motorways.

What is illegal is undertaking, which is quite a different thing entirely.
 
268

Do not overtake on the left or move to a lane on your left to overtake. In congested conditions, where adjacent lanes of traffic are moving at similar speeds, traffic in left-hand lanes may sometimes be moving faster than traffic to the right. In these conditions you may keep up with the traffic in your lane even if this means passing traffic in the lane to your right. Do not weave in and out of lanes to overtake.
 
For the middle lane hoggers, I pull out from lane 1 to lane 3 (if safe to do so and whilst indicating), overtake, then whilst indicating pull over from lane 3 to lane 1 (if safe to do so). 5/10 times they get the hint.

An old sales rep I knew used to to do this to dozy middle lane hoggers - except he would keep dropping back and repeating it on the same unsuspecting driver whilst making Red Indian hand to mouth gestures until the hogger got the point and pulled in.

He called it 'Cowboy's & Indians'
 
As stated by some, nothing wrong with going past on the left if they are moving slower, if you were already on the left and remain on the left for a while after.

People who sit in the left hand lane ( on a dual carriageway mainly ) frightened to go past the car on the right are just as bad, if not worse than those in the right hand lane going slow regarding causing congestion / a hazard.

But also use common sense, if its a nana / grandda in their aygo/micra doing 40 in a 60 in the right hand lane, expect them to pull in on you without warning. This is not to say that you will be at fault, just their lack of awareness.
 
Back
Top Bottom