Blimey, i can't believe I'm having to point out such basic concepts to you. If someone is passively aggressively referring to someone in the third person there is no idea to attack, it's literally impossible to attack an argument because they're not making one, they're making snide comments with zero substance.
In such an instance saying it's cowardly and weak is not a personal insult, it's a statement of fact.
e: You're welcome to point out where the substance, the argument is in in these though...
Last time I'm going to bother, you've said
The definition of racism is "A person who is prejudiced against or antagonistic towards people on the basis of their membership of a particular racial or ethnic group, typically one that is a minority or marginalized." My emphasis because prejudice is defined as a "Preconceived opinion that is not based on reason or actual experience." so if someone had a valid reason or experience for being antagonistic towards people on the basis of their membership of a particular racial or ethnic group then it wouldn't be racist.
Highlighted the relevant part as you seem to struggle, to which Dis replied stating that applying a negative aspect of one individual to all is racist, you then doubled down quoting the above definition in your own post and topped it off with
See above and learn what racism is.
So you've taken one of many dictionary definitions of racism and added your own flavour into it to explain what you consider racism to be, you then changed tact from a singular person
If you've been a victim of constant abuse, physical or mental, from a black person
to multiple persons, only after having it pointed out that experiencing abuse at the hands of one person and tarring an entire racial/ethnic group is, well, racist. Even then, tarring an entire racial/ethnic group by the actions of a few is racist. You then tried to correct Dis for his use of the word reason by yet again posting a dictionary definition, which ironically included the context of his use of the word.
Lets see, where next.. oh yes, dictionary definition of the word discrimination. Again you homed in one small element of the definition, going back to the word prejudiced and ignoring "The unjust or" element of the definition. A common theme in your posts on the subject as you did exactly the same with the definition of the word racist by ignoring the "or antagonistic" element. In every single instance of you posting dictionary definitions you continuously/purposely ignore the full definition of the word, instead just focusing on one part. To be honest I've never known someone to post some many dictionary definitions of words yet still fail to comprehend the actual meaning of words.
We'll ignore once again your comparison with women's shelters because its laughable and the more you stick by the more you come across as a complete moron.
So, long and short of it is based on your own words a person can not be racist if they have a 'excuse' handy, oh and incase you were wondering about the definition of the word excuse in this instance. Here you go chuckles: Seek to lessen the blame attaching to (a fault or offence); try to justify.
I've said it once, I'll say it again, you are an apologist for racists, you excuse behaviors that are discriminatory because the people that practice them are 'on your side'.
Once again as I know you struggle tarring an entire racial/ethnic group by the actions of a few is racist.
Edit: feel free to whine and cry about being ignored, I wont bother replying.