killing him is the only option
its not the right one - but its the only one we can think until we actually are able to solve these problems at their core.
e.g. a poor gardener spends all his time pulling weeds out when they appear, it doesnt solve the problem. He should eliminate them by the root...otherwise its a neverending cycle of woe.
So does this mean if it becomes possible to prevent such people from being born (via genetic manipulation) we should do so?
Another option...slightly more fantastical and theoretical...
If it were possible for this man to experience exactly what the victim AND the relatives suffer as a result of what he has done. Then go with this (prolly only works if he is sane though)
its not the right one - but its the only one we can think until we actually are able to solve these problems at their core.
e.g. a poor gardener spends all his time pulling weeds out when they appear, it doesnt solve the problem. He should eliminate them by the root...otherwise its a neverending cycle of woe.
So does this mean if it becomes possible to prevent such people from being born (via genetic manipulation) we should do so?
Another option...slightly more fantastical and theoretical...
If it were possible for this man to experience exactly what the victim AND the relatives suffer as a result of what he has done. Then go with this (prolly only works if he is sane though)
