- Joined
- 9 Dec 2015
- Posts
- 800
Review of the 27" applies to all the models.
https://www.rtings.com/monitor/reviews/acer/nitro-xv273x
very posh
https://www.rtings.com/monitor/reviews/acer/nitro-xv273x
very posh
Bought the XV253QP, really impressed with it, lots of features not mentioned in spec, 10bit colour (thats what says in windows and driver?), cross hair overlay (nearly bought the asus for that as the acer doesn't mention it), onscreen fps counter. Has HDR which the Asus doesn't, perfect picture out the box though HDR goes super bright not messed about with it yet. Really solid, the stand is a work of art, very heavy duty with no screws, nothing cheap about any of it at all which was a concern never had Acer.
No fuzzy text on vertical scrolling like the last 144hz monitor I bought had.
Its still not available anywhere though, only rainforest.
Any idea what the freesync range is? Does the manual say?
Can't find that info anywhere, assuming it's 48-144hz (maybe 60-144hz when on nvidia like some monitors), but no where has the info and acer's site doesn't even list it yet.
Its 48-144hz though the new AMD drivers don't tell you like they used to but when its on i've watched it drop to like 50 odd so sure its 48-144hz. They don't mention a lot of its features anywhere to be honest, last minute it got g sync branding thats not mentioned in adverts same with 10/12bit colour modes and other options.
Thanks. So weird there is so little info.
New 1440p/144hz ips launches and sites fall over themselves to review. 1080/144 ips, something there hasn't been any before and hardly any reviews or decent info.
As a monitor reviewer I'd just like to point out that we're often at the mercy of what the manufacturer or PR companies supply for review. Their samples of WQHD 144Hz+ IPS models are usually quite plentiful, whereas the Full HD 144Hz+ options are often not circulated. There are some exceptions, like the AOC 24G2(U) I recently reviewed. But many manufacturers including Acer and ASUS are a lot more selective about which models they circulate for review.
Any idea why they are being so tight with the 1080/144?
The prices on 240hz IPS seem to be nearly in line so i am curious why this thread is popular really? You guys seen the VG259QM over the VG259Q?
They are quite close but the 24 inch IPS panels seem like they will cost around the same as 144hz at £350 no? What do you all think?
First I seen of the VG259QM, looks decent.
The 144hz models are around £270 for both acer and asus though
@MegaPinches
Have you had any problems with the colours resetting on the XV253QP, like this
https://old.reddit.com/r/Monitors/comments/e7fja2/24_144hz_1080p_ips_monitor_acer_nitro_vg240yp_vs/
Hopefully the bug is only in the cheaper VG240YP with the Panda panel. Going on user reviews, seems like the Acer is the best overall, so if it's all good will probably go for it later this month/early next month.
Nah ive had nothing like that on this
Its a no brainer against the Asus version for same price, 10/12 bit colour, HDR 400, better looking and people report the Asus has a green tint.
Thanks.
I read that about the Asus as well (green tint). Seems like the Acer is the way to go for me then. Not on Nvidia's certified compatiblity list yet, but considering it's advertised as g-sync on the box and the cheaper vg252Q is on the list (same monitor, just a crap stand without the usb hub), then should all be good.
Don't worry its got G sync all over it, G sync sticker and G sync logo on power on, its listed in an Nvidia driver update recently. All freesync monitors work with 1000 series and above anyway right?
I read somewhere someone having issues at 12bit high refresh and review mentions somin about that too, 12bit is only available through HDMI though, I use DP 10bit 144hz, honestly so impressed with it, is the nuts.
Bought the XV253QP, really impressed with it, lots of features not mentioned in spec, 10bit colour (thats what says in windows and driver?), cross hair overlay (nearly bought the asus for that as the acer doesn't mention it), onscreen fps counter. Has HDR which the Asus doesn't, perfect picture out the box though HDR goes super bright not messed about with it yet. Really solid, the stand is a work of art, very heavy duty with no screws, nothing cheap about any of it at all which was a concern never had Acer.
No fuzzy text on vertical scrolling like the last 144hz monitor I bought had.
Its still not available anywhere though, only rainforest.
Going to purchase this monitor here as well, as it is probably the best choise for me and my brother for replacing the Dell 2007FP we're rocking. the only concerens i have are regarding the quality control of the monitor (aka dead pixels, light bleed) and the Overdrive being locked on normal with adaptive sync. how is the ghosting? what happens when you set Overdrive to the extreme?
p.s - i've read that the built in speakers were really not that good