- Joined
- 5 Feb 2009
- Posts
- 3,970
As for 2600x Vs 2700x. Just get the 2700 and overclock to 4.1/2ghz manually
I thought that the Ryzens, particularly the 2*** series, tended to do better when allowed to do their own thing with the boost rather than applying an all-core overclock? Feel sure I've read that in a few places? Although maybe the difference is just too small to matter?
Such a movie doesn't exist
When you claim such things, at least give us a link to check it out.
not so muhc wiping the floor as i Hoped, thought it would offer better performance but
9 mins in R3 1200 vs G5600 + GTX 1030 for both
[snip]
My basket at Overclockers UK:
- 1 x Intel Pentium G5500 3.80GHz (Coffee Lake) Socket LGA1151 Processor - Retail= £74.99
- 1 x Team Group Vulcan T-Force 8GB (2x4GB) DDR4 PC4-19200C14 2400MHz Dual Channel Kit - Grey (TLGD48G2400= £68.99
vs
My basket at Overclockers UK:
Arrgh... this decision is tough. Back to going through the permutations again!
I've seen the G5400 for under £55, which is £45 cheaper than the 2200G. And it's £55 cheaper when you factor in not needing such expensive RAM to get the most from it, which is even more than the saving shown here, and much pays for the difference between a GT1030 and a GTX1050 (yeah, I'm getting that the 1030 is not a great option).
On the other hand... the AM4 option offers slightly better CPU performance right now it seems, and will likely have a better upgrade potential for a longer time. Could even get away with using the iGPU for a few months and save up for a GTX1050(Ti) for Christmas.
On the gripping hand... upgrading the G5400 with a second-hand i5-8400 or 8700 in a year or two would surely mean the Coffeelake system would easily last for five or six years as a decent gaming set-up anyway, so is it really that much worse off in the future-proofing stakes than the AMD system?
I guess this means neither decision is a bad one, at least...