US almost nuked itself in 1961

I thought that bombs had to be armed before they'll do anything? I.E. you could smack a truck into one, but if it's not armed it'll do nowt.

Nuclear weapons are caused to explode by conventional explosive, usually arranged in a sphere around the nuclear material, focusing the conventional explosive into the nuclear material. You'd still get a decent enough conventional explosion but mixed among that would be lots of Radioactive material, a so called 'dirty' bomb. The initial explosion would be relatively small but the radioactive material released into the air could make a great deal of people very sick and kill hundreds if not thousands through radiation poisoning.
 
Last edited:
I can't figure out what's making me chuckle more:

(1) The either **** pilot or **8* engineers which caused the bomb to drop.

(2) The fact that the drop activated nuclear weapons failed to arm correctly, proving they can't build those properly either!

I assume the guy that built the plane was accompanied by the nuclear bomb maker when they sent them into the room to dismantle the half armed nuclear bomb that failed to go boom boom.

Comedy gold.
 
I remember the Govt. downplaying Lakenheath. The H-bombs over Goldsboro would have been a game changer. A couple of H-bombs exploding in America would have made the world a safer place. No later Cuba crisis.
 
I remember the Govt. downplaying Lakenheath. The H-bombs over Goldsboro would have been a game changer. A couple of H-bombs exploding in America would have made the world a safer place. No later Cuba crisis.

No it wouldn't.

The likelihood is in times like those the US would have blamed Russia whether they knew the truth to save face or whether they were unsure of facts so to respond. Next thing you know it would have been nuclear Armageddon.
 
I can't figure out what's making me chuckle more:

(1) The either **** pilot or **8* engineers which caused the bomb to drop.

(2) The fact that the drop activated nuclear weapons failed to arm correctly, proving they can't build those properly either!

I assume the guy that built the plane was accompanied by the nuclear bomb maker when they sent them into the room to dismantle the half armed nuclear bomb that failed to go boom boom.

Comedy gold.

Not as funny as your complete and total misunderstanding displayed in point 2. Now that really is comedy gold.

Incidents like this are the main reason everything moved to sub based missiles tho7gh.
 
The US has nuked itself hundreds of times.
yup .every circle in this pic is a nuke explosion
and this is a little part of the Nevada test range
.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nevada_National_Security_Site
.
nevadatestrange.jpg
 
Isn't it standard procedure for a nuclear bomber to drop its payload if it gets into trouble? unarmed the bombs/missiles wouldn't be a threat whereas if they wen't down with the plane that could cause an issue.

Wasn't the also an incident where the USAF nearly nuked Sussex at some point? May have been Surrey or Suffolk.
 
Not as funny as your complete and total misunderstanding displayed in point 2. Now that really is comedy gold.

Incidents like this are the main reason everything moved to sub based missiles tho7gh.

I have to disagree on that.

Think about it tactically, the submarine as a launch platform is the fundamental idea behind the deterrent. How can another country guarantee taking out another countries nuclear capabilities 100% in the first strike when they cannot account for the location of all ICBM's. Silo's/Bunkers and other facilities cannot move or be extremely hard to detect, so submarines ensure the MAD (Mutually Assured Destruction) idea.

So no one nukes each other :cool:
 
So they were dropped but didn't go off?

260 times more powerful than the hiroshima atom bomb would probably wipe out not just America, but the whole planet! (guess from things like Tsunami and other aftermath)

260 times more powerful than hiroshima will not wake sleeping children from 50 miles away
 
Tasar (however you spell it) was 50MT nuclear device (most powerful nuclear device ever tested) how does that compare to the energy output say of a volcanic explosion? like how many MT explosion was Mt Saint Helens?

or the Tundra Incident??
 
Last edited:
Tasar (however you spell it) was 50MT nuclear device (most powerful nuclear device ever tested) how does that compare to the energy output say of a volcanic explosion? like how many MT explosion was Mt Saint Helens?

  • Seymour Narrows, British Columbia 1958. 1,375 tons of chemical explosives. 1.375 kilotons
  • Little Boy, the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima, Japan on August 6, 1945. 13 kilotons.
  • Fat man, the atomic bomb dropped on Nagasaki, Japan on August 9, 1945. 20 kilotons.
  • The Tanguska Event, suspected comet impact in Tanguska, Russia on June 30, 1908. 10 megatons
  • The Bravo test, one of the Bikini Atoll bomb tests. February 1954, was, at 15 megatons, the most powerful bomb ever detonated by the United States--far bigger than expected. 15 megatons
  • One pound of antimatter 19.5 megatons
  • Mount St. Helen May 18, 1980. 24 megatons
  • Tsar Bomba, the largest nuclear weapon ever detonated 11:32 AM 30 October 1961 (Moscow Time) Such a device could be souped up to deliver a 100 megaton blast. 50 megatons
  • The third 1883 eruption of Krakatoa 150 megatons
  • Hurricane Katrina hitting the Gulf Coast. At full power, a hurricane like Katrina releases 10 megatons every 20 minutes. 300 megatons
  • World War III, computed as the simultaneous explosion of all known nuclear devices (about 15,000 today). 10,000 megatons
  • "Dinosaur Killer" Impact of 10-15 km asteroid traveling at 20 kilometers per second. 100,000,000 megatons or 10^8 megatons
  • A supernova, an explosion powerful enough to destroy a solar system. 10 billion billion billion megatons or 10^27 megatons
 
Last edited:
Tasar (however you spell it) was 50MT nuclear device (most powerful nuclear device ever tested) how does that compare to the energy output say of a volcanic explosion? like how many MT explosion was Mt Saint Helens?

or the Tundra Incident??

probably 20-30MT Though krakatoa was about 200MT if i remember correctly.
 
Last edited:
It makes me wonder if the US would have a different attitude to bombing anyone it feels like now. Probably not.

I also heard a story about a plane crashing while landing during the 70s or 80s at either Bentwaters or Lakenheath. Apparently burning aviation fuel was thrown over some live nukes being stored in a hangar. No idea how true that is.
 
Seymour Narrows, British Columbia 1958. 1,375 tons of chemical explosives. 1.375 kilotons
Little Boy, the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima, Japan on August 6, 1945. 13 kilotons.
Fat man, the atomic bomb dropped on Nagasaki, Japan on August 9, 1945. 20 kilotons.
The Tanguska Event, suspected comet impact in Tanguska, Russia on June 30, 1908. 10 megatons
The Bravo test, one of the Bikini Atoll bomb tests. February 1954, was, at 15 megatons, the most powerful bomb ever detonated by the United States--far bigger than expected. 15 megatons
One pound of antimatter 19.5 megatons
Mount St. Helen May 18, 1980. 24 megatons
Tsar Bomba, the largest nuclear weapon ever detonated 11:32 AM 30 October 1961 (Moscow Time) Such a device could be souped up to deliver a 100 megaton blast. 50 megatons
The third 1883 eruption of Krakatoa 150 megatons
Hurricane Katrina hitting the Gulf Coast. At full power, a hurricane like Katrina releases 10 megatons every 20 minutes. 300 megatons
World War III, computed as the simultaneous explosion of all known nuclear devices (about 15,000 today). 10,000 megatons
"Dinosaur Killer" Impact of 10-15 km asteroid traveling at 20 kilometers per second. 100,000,000 megatons or 10^8 megatons
A supernova, an explosion powerful enough to destroy a solar system. 10 billion billion billion megatons or 10^27 megatons

WOW thats shocking i thought natural disasters would be more powerful.
 
Back
Top Bottom