USB 3.0 or USB 2.0?

Permabanned
Joined
13 Nov 2015
Posts
7
hey, USB 3.0 flash drive is well on the way, but I do not think it can reach the theoretical speed of 480 Mbps, I have tried it, maybe 200 Mbps,but the price is much higher than USB 2.0 flash drive
Found a Kingston 8GB USB drive, cost only $2.69 , so USB 2.0 will go cheaper ,good news for our clients,:D
 
Remember not to confuse bits and bytes. The theoretical maximum of USB2.0 is 480 megabits per second, which is 60 megabytes per second. Also, I believe USB2.0 is only half duplex, so it's actually 30 megabytes per second up and 30 megabytes per second down. That's before you factor in any overhead.

In practice, I generally find that most of the USB2.0 drives I have used tend to write at 4-15 megabytes per second, with cheaper ones being slower. With USB 3.0, I find that the drives I have tend to write at 60-120 megabytes per second. This can be a huge difference, especially as the price difference between USB2.0 and USB3.0 isn't that much anymore in my opinion.

A couple of weeks ago, I had to copy 20GB of data to a USB2.0 32GB drive my brother-in-law gave to put the data on, it took just over an hour and a half to complete. I then did the same to a USB3.0 32GB drive I had, and the same completed in just under 5 minutes. For me, that kind of time difference is well worth the extra expense and I simply don't buy USB2.0 drives anymore.
 
if u need speed u need to research and find the read/write speed, theres slow usb3 drives, and quite a few that are slow write but fast read
 
if u need speed u need to research and find the read/write speed, theres slow usb3 drives, and quite a few that are slow write but fast read

Very much this, easy to get caught out with a headline that says "Speeds up to 100mb/s" and then find out that it writes at no better speeds than your USB 2.0 and the read speeds only get half way there.
 
only buy usb 3, had an old usb 2 64 gb that took 4-6 hours to fill, even a slow usb 3 is a lot faster than the fast usb 2 and the price is maybe a few pounds at best if 64 gb
 
With the prices of 3.0 being pretty comparative to 2.0 these days, IMO it's a bit of a no-brainer to go for USB 3.0.

The performance increase will be more than worth a small price difference.
 
Back
Top Bottom