Its better, deal with it.
I still don't get it, although your first statement could be changed to:
'One and Susan are here' if you are referring to yourself as 'One' and not 'the one', but apart from that, wt actual f?
Last edited:
Its better, deal with it.
I still don't get it, although your first statement could be changed to:
'One and Susan are here' if you are referring to yourself as 'One' and not 'the one' and referring to yourself in a past tense (?), but apart from that, wt actual f?
You wouldn't use One in this context, as redz so succinctly illustrated. It would remain Susan and I, as etiquette would demand you put the other person first, colloquially you could use me and Susan, but you wouldn't hear the Queen use that.....
For example could you imagine the Queen saying;
One and Philip will be dining at Noon.
Or
Philip and I shall be dining at Noon.
If she was dining alone or refering to herself only then:
One will be dining at Noon.
Would be acceptable.
Nicely put, but 'me and Susan are here' equals 'me is here', but 'I and Susan are here' equals 'I am here'....I think?
Language is funny!!![]()
colloquially you could use me and Susan,
If by "colloquially" you mean "incorrectly" then yes. Otherwise, no.
One does not simply go shopping with Susan.![]()
There is a difference between formal and informal usage in language, particularly English.
And with those who most often use informal language. Check out the first paragraph of the wiki article on colloquialism. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colloquialism![]()
Lol....did you just edit Wikipedia.....![]()
No. I was looking up the etymology of the word and found that in the search.
It's gone......![]()
There is a difference between formal and informal usage in language, particularly English. But in grammatically correct formal usage you would always put yourself second in reference.