Useful SSD benchmark?

Associate
Joined
7 Sep 2010
Posts
531
I'm almost decided on my new SSD, having heard great things about them in general (and horror stories about specific models). Two top candidates are the Crucial M4 and Corsair Force 3 (not sure about OCZ Agility 3's, Vertex 3's are too much, dunno about Adata :confused:), and here's the comparison :

http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/400?vs=355

[NB - Why do Anandtech mix 'Higher is better/Lower is better' results? It makes a quick glance comparison very tricky.]

Some results are close (within 10%), others are more than 100% different, on both sides. I think the M4 wins overall, but without knowing the real-world relevance of each benchmark it's difficult to be sure. So my question is :

What's the most useful/meaningful/reliable benchmark for real-world use?

I realise everyone uses their PC/SSD differently, but I would be using the SSD as a boot drive for Win7, plus a few apps (which I guess is the most common setup until they become radically cheaper per GB). To further complicate the answer (if there is a single answer), if I get a larger (120GB+) SSD I could use a partition on it for SSD-caching with my Z68 mobo - would this rely more heavily on writes?

I know there's no simple answer (although "Incompressible Sequential Read" would be my guess), and there are many compound benchmarks (such as Anandtech's Heavy/Light Workloads 2011). I'm on a budget (<£150 for 120GB SATA-III), but I'm really after an explanation of various benchmarks than a recommendation of a specific SSD.
 
dunno about Adata :confused:),
So my question is :

What's the most useful/meaningful/reliable benchmark for real-world use?
if I get a larger (120GB+) SSD I could use a partition on it for SSD-caching with my Z68 mobo - would this rely more heavily on writes?

Adata seem to be slightly slower & only have a 2 yr warantee compared to 3 yrs for others.

Not to be glib but the best benchmark is use in yr PC unless it is identical to the test system in every respect. I think too many get hung up on benchmarks. They are a useful indicator/start point but no the be all & end all.
Whatever you choose will be faster that yr current hdd!
I have seen comment that boot time is 12 or 14 seconds, all I know is that from post beep to loaded desktop I got about 54 which was about 45 faster than with hdd.

I saw the steps for stting up a partition as a cache drive. For me they were very complicated- too many things to do/ to go wrong. So I'd leave the 120GB as a single partition.

OCZ recommends ATTO for resultsa that are closest to what you should expect in the "Real World"
Go for the Crucial to avoid the Sandforce issues. There has just been a firmware update for it that boosts performance significantly:)
 
Back
Top Bottom