Soldato
- Joined
- 19 May 2005
- Posts
- 6,891
Looks impressive.
Looks impressive.
The lower latency that 5G gives over 4G should make it quite viable as an alternative to fixed line, assuming you have decent coverage.
@Nasher do you have an external antenna or anything?
It's unfortunately comically asymmetric - is that a technology limit or a decision taken by the network operators?
Same as pretty much all home internet connections. Most people don't need a super fast upload.
Meh. That's a fairly ISP-centric argument tbf. People didn't 'need' a fast download, until one became available and the content started to become available to match it (big games, large files, 4k movies etc). If a symmetric upload became the norm the uses for it would likewise begin to materialise. Offsite backups, P2P transfers (and I'm not talking 'Linux ISOs' specifically), real time collaboration on creative projects... There's all kinds of use cases, both existing and novel, that could take advantage of, say, 1Gbs+ upstream.
Same as pretty much all home internet connections. Most people don't need a super fast upload.
You won't get that in the UK unless you pay for a leased line, which is mega expensive and something only big companies get.
640 down and 43 up is one of the worst ratios available in the UK though
You won't get that in the UK unless you pay for a leased line, which is mega expensive and something only big companies get.
Then you'll need to buy a 10gbit router and network cards then, which arent cheap.
It's approx. 4x what I get and I don't have many upload issues at home. I imagine the vast majority of customers don't need a huge upload speed, hence asymmetrical connections
E: I'd also wager the VAST majority of 100mbsp+ download customers just choose that option because "it must be better" than the cheaper options, with no specific need
On 1gig service?just got the email to upgrade to the Hub4, any issues using it in modem mode?