- Joined
- 5 Dec 2003
- Posts
- 21,063
- Location
- Just to the left of my PC
"Slow lane" or "additional bandwidth" is just semantics but let's just say I would never pay money to an ISP that does not offer neutral bandwidth.
It isn't just semantics if looked at superficially. Giving more bandwidth to some websites while keeping the majority at the same as now is very different to giving the majority less bandwidth than now.
It will have an effect, though. Eventually, high-bandwidth sites such as YouTube, TV online services like iplayer, big game patch and demo download sites, etc, will have to pay ISPs in order to function properly. That means they either have to pay every ISP or they can only be accessed properly with specific ISPs. So you might be able to watch BBC TV online with AOL, but not with Virgin, but Virgin will give you great access to game patches and demos, whereas AOL's access to them will suck. Big ISPs, getting a lot of money from websites, will be able to hugely undercut smaller ISPs, putting them out of business. Sites that don't pay big ISPs will have far less bandwidth to use than sites that do, so they will not be able to be popular and they will not be able to use flashy and/or useful stuff that uses a lot of bandwidth.