• Notice regarding image hosts and attachments. See here.

Virtual Machines

Associate
Joined
16 Aug 2005
Posts
858
Location
Cardiff
Right,

I've looked through the Mac Software thread but can only find random bits and pieces on this.

In a nutshell, what are the differences between VM Fusion and Parallels?

I'm looking to run XP/linux on a VM just to have a mess around with and to install some test software for work.

Have you lot used either of these? Have they got their advantages/disadvantages?

I've got 4GB of RAM so not an issue for me to run either I would imagine, any help would be appreciated :)

Thanks!
 
I use VM Fusion.

Tried Parallels nothing really wrong with it, just prefer VM Ware. Main thing I use in VM Ware is the Virtual Appliance thing so I can easily move my VM's from place to place.

Parallels integrates quite nicely with OS X, folder linking and such forth so that might be something to consider.

I think VM Ware was also a bit cheaper when I came to buying it (got a special discount as I pre-ordered it during the beta).
 
I've used both and prefer parallels for some reaso, can't really explain why though, sorry!
 
This thread goes through a few opinions.

In a nutshell though, they are both very similar, do practically the same things. ive only ever used vmware fusion and it works very well , and I can virtualise my bootcamp partition (parallels can do this too).
 
Back
Top Bottom