Soldato
- Joined
- 15 Feb 2003
- Posts
- 10,141
- Location
- Europe
Then, of course, there's the much simpler reduction in security caused by the fact that contactless cards require only possession of the card for payments under £45. If someone steals my card, they could probably get away with stealing hundreds of pounds at <£45 each time. A serious thief wouldn't bother but casual thieves might.
Personally, I use a contactless card because I couldn't be bothered with the fuss required to get one that isn't. I don't consider the reduction in security significant enough to care about. But I understand why some people do.
The limit for contactless is now £100 a time. You card provider will set how many transactions can be done before a pin is required. The card provider is liable in the case of fraud so long as you haven't been negligent which wouldn't be the case in the scenarios you've outlined.
As you say, each unto their own. For me but convenience trumps extra security for me. Though mostly I only use a phone as cards are pretty antiquated these days.
Last edited: