Associate
- Joined
- 24 May 2003
- Posts
- 1,429
- Location
- UK
I've heard that in Vista it doesn't allow hardware acceleration to be used in sound cards - is this true?
Apparently there's a Vista file called audiobg.exe running that handles the sound, this file is allegedly supposed to use a CPU core to itself meaning that on a quad core CPU you lose 25% of the CPU power - is this right?
Apparently the Hardware Abstraction Layer is absent from Vista?
If this is true then why would Vista refuse to defer to the soundcard for sound processing?
I have recently bought a Creative X-Fi sound card with quite a powerful DSP chip and had I known this then I may as well have settled for onboard sound
Would the reason why Microsoft has done this be something to do with Vista DRM issues?
Apparently there's a Vista file called audiobg.exe running that handles the sound, this file is allegedly supposed to use a CPU core to itself meaning that on a quad core CPU you lose 25% of the CPU power - is this right?
Apparently the Hardware Abstraction Layer is absent from Vista?
If this is true then why would Vista refuse to defer to the soundcard for sound processing?
I have recently bought a Creative X-Fi sound card with quite a powerful DSP chip and had I known this then I may as well have settled for onboard sound

Would the reason why Microsoft has done this be something to do with Vista DRM issues?