Vista loading times

Steve2000 · 25 Jan 2009 at 12:44

Actually just checked and it was set by default to one core. Switched it to two now so I'll see how this goes.

rodders · 25 Jan 2009 at 13:06

I've just found Vista to be much slower at booting than XP on any of my computers.

EsaT · 25 Jan 2009 at 14:18

rodders said:
I've just found Vista to be much slower at booting than XP on any of my computers.

Bloatware which expands exponentially with every new version.
That's the best description of resource consumption of Windows OSes.

Happy · 25 Jan 2009 at 14:31

rodders said:
I've just found Vista to be much slower at booting than XP on any of my computers.

Same with me, except on my 36GB Raptor system. Which is strange because my other 320GB F1 system benches higher :confused:

Hassan23 · 25 Jan 2009 at 14:43

woohoo iv'e just done a full tune up and got 27 seconds. sorry to go off topic a bit but i wonder if they have improved the boot time in windows 7 can anyone shed some light.

Hassan

LordSplodge · 25 Jan 2009 at 14:56

Vista takes longer from boot to logon screen on my new computer than it did on my old.

I'm not talking all the little **** that loads once you log on but rather the actual boot time. Go figure.

StephenLawUK · 25 Jan 2009 at 15:06

Windows 7 is still in beta but its boot times are better than vista as it has less bloat in it. But SSD is still the way to go for faster boot times with any OS

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=j9q9I4k8D7Y Solid State Disk vs Hard Disk

J.B · 25 Jan 2009 at 15:11

If the system has been running for a while it might be worth downloading Auslogic disk defrag and running that, and run CClearner first just to unclog the system.

RickST · 25 Jan 2009 at 15:17

downloaded that tune up thingy... did a defrag... destroyed one of my dll.. now my boot is down to 0 seconds

Redgie · 25 Jan 2009 at 15:56

I just set my boot to use 4 procesors instead of whatever it defaulted to, no difference at all.

How about a 10 second vista boot? http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=Q0v_49DRi30&feature=related

reflux · 25 Jan 2009 at 15:58

Redgie said:
I just set my boot to use 4 procesors instead of whatever it defaulted to, no difference at all.

Aye, that's cos that's an option designed to help system builders test faulty machines.

StephenLawUK · 25 Jan 2009 at 16:04

Redgie said:
I just set my boot to use 4 procesors instead of whatever it defaulted to, no difference at all.

How about a 10 second vista boot? http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=Q0v_49DRi30&feature=related

someone has too much money lol 9x mtron SSD's in raid 0

Happy · 25 Jan 2009 at 16:57

Redgie said:
I just set my boot to use 4 procesors instead of whatever it defaulted to, no difference at all.

How about a 10 second vista boot? http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=Q0v_49DRi30&feature=related

Holy crap

That's insane

spellcaster · 25 Jan 2009 at 17:07

I have a duo core E8400 with 4gig vista gold memory and ati 4850 gpu yet my 64bit vista ultimate can take over a minute to fully load. Windows 7 beta on my laptop takes about the same time too so its not a new os I suspect its vista in disguise