Volvo v50

Soldato
Joined
25 Aug 2010
Posts
3,033
anyone got one of these?
looking for buying advice, what to look for etc if anyone know anything, some reasonable looking ones under the 4k mark but not sure of the engines, seems the 1.8 petrol and 2.0D are the common ones...
 
Boring to drive, not a massive amount of room for an estate, but nice interior.
1.8 is slow and uneconomical, like most of the petrol range.
Diesels have issues AFAIK, but maybe that's just heresay.
 
are there any petrol estates that aren't boring to drive or have similar fuel economy?
the v50 seems to have similar economy to the avant, Passat and 3 series touring...
 
My brother has a 56-plate V50 2.0D
All was well for a while, but he has had DPF issues that couldn't be cleared without trip to Dealer; some sort of additive seems to be needed (again from Dealer) occasionally; aircon has died and is seemingly scary to fix and a selection of ECU/EML faults that come and go :(
Nice car in terms of interior/spec, but he has had problems.....but, that could easily be a bad example too!
 
The v50 was based on the focus so a focus estate isn't much smaller I think the 2.0 diesel is a ford engine as well might be wrong on that but the focus will be better to drive, not exactly exciting though!
 
are there any petrol estates that aren't boring to drive or have similar fuel economy?
the v50 seems to have similar economy to the avant, Passat and 3 series touring...
The T5 is fast but expect mid-high 20s for MPG.
The 2.4i with 170bhp is OK I guess, but again the fuel economy is abysmal.
My mum had a 2.4 for 5 years and it averaged 26MPG and that just isn't good enough.
I'd much rather have a BMW E46 Touring.

What do you want from the car? Load carrying ability? Fuel economy? General comfort?
If you're annual mileage isn't high, then there's not much to go wrong with a petrol V50. It's just that IMO the performance doesn't justify the fuel economy.
 
Last edited:
well, at the moment the wife is running my R53 up and down to her work and it's doing less than 20mpg through the week!
so just want something semi-practical that we can put a dog into and some people at the same time, and the wife can toodle about in

only real reason for an estate is the mutt
 
Your mileage would suggest staying away from modern diesels then, otherwise you're going to run into DPF issues.

I can't think that many £4k petrol estates are going to manage more than 20mpg on an urban run though.
 
yeah, the only diesel I'm really considering is the vag pd engine estates without the dpf - but they are either moon miles or expensive!
just wondered if any one has experience of these Volvos and if there are things to look out for
 
2008 MY2009 D5 SE LUX here.

Bought it at auction as a stop gap car, did a few suspension items to freshen it up but other than that it is knocking on the door of 120k and has just passed its MoT with not a single issue.

I have had the DPF induced oil level issue once, but the dealer sorted that for free. It's just an excuse to give it a good boot every so often, but my more regular motorway trips have prevented reoccurrence. If I decide to keep the car I'm going to get it removed whilst I have it mapped.

The D5 pulls well and does decent MPG if your not a loony (currently sitting at 53 MPG at an average speed of just over 45 IIRC) can be tuned to 215HP/500NM from 180/400 for about £400.

Comfortable long distance cruiser and as you can imagine it isn't sporty. But fitting polybushes and new slightly better 3rd party shocks have improved the tightness no end.

However I will probably be moving on from this to a 6 pot 5 series touring in the next year or two.
 
Last edited:
I share a Volvo V50 2008 2.0D S trim with my other half and I'm not impressed. The trip computer is non-existent as it's an expensive option, yes the trip computer! The 2.0 diesel is nice to drive and fairly refined for a diesel, we're averaging 43MPG (brim to brim calculating) with the occasional motorway. The interior is of good quality and isn't very plasticy.

If you're looking at buying one check the aircon works, if not it's most definitely a faulty condenser. They're a notoious weak spot and prone to rusting and failing. Our V50 condenser was replaced in April free of charge due to the rust issue. If you decide on a V50 go for the R-Design trim otherwise you'll regret it.
 
Last edited:
I share a Volvo V50 2008 2.0D S trim with my other half and I'm not impressed. The trip computer is non-existent as it's an expensive option, yes the trip computer! The 2.0 diesel is nice to drive and fairly refined for a diesel, we're averaging 43MPG (brim to brim calculating) with the occasional motorway. The interior is of good quality and isn't very plasticy.

If you're looking at buying one check the aircon works, if not it's most definitely a faulty condenser. They're a notoious weak spot and prone to rusting and failing. Our V50 condenser was replaced in April free of charge due to the rust issue. If you decide on a V50 go for the R-Design trim otherwise you'll regret it.

Correction: R-Design or SE Lux :p
 
I have a 2007 V50 2.0 D S, although I will only have it about another week as I have put a deposit on an E90 320i now. But I have had the V50 for 2 years, nothing has gone wrong with it other than me having to replace 2 wheel bearings, and a 3rd is making a noise now too. Apparently the wheel bearings are a known weakness, mine has been great though, really can't complain.

Although mine is an S, it has a trip computer, cruise control, dual zone climate, steering mounted stereo controls and heated front seats. I would recommend you get either an SE/Lux or an S with the missing bits fitted as options like I did.

They are pretty good alround cars in my opinion, you could do a lot worse, my main criticism is a chronic lack of cabin storage, the door 'pockets' are a complete joke and all in all they are rather cramped inside really. The 2.0 diesel engine is a Ford/PSA unit, it's a decent engine really, quite comparable to all the other 2 litre commonrail diesels but revs more freely and smoothly than many, however it does lack the very low end torque of the VAG engines, you don't really get any until about 1,800rpm on the Volvo, so although you get the expected 240lb/ft you would from an equivalent engine from VAG ...it doesn't come in quite as usably low in reality.

I'm not a 4 cylidner diesel fan at all really, they annoy me with their narrow power bands and lowspeed/idle clatter, but as such engines go, the engine in the Volvo is fine. The interior is better than most, the exterior looks are entirely a matter of personal taste (I like them more than most) and the over all drive is again comparable to any other you care to mention, not as soft as an Accord, Insignia or Pasat ...but not quite as sporty as a Focus. I compare to two different size categories of car purely because the Volvo is priced more like the larger cars yet is infact a bit smaller.
 
Last edited:
[TW]Fox;24690842 said:

:D ...I thought you might react that way, tbh I went in half expecting a dreadful ride and a crap interior, but that's not what I found, not on the facelifted SE I am buying anyway, and the 2 litre petrol engine packs more of a punch than I was expecting it too, it's also smoother than I thought it would be (the autobox is really smooth, makes the X350 Jag ones seem rather jerky tbh). I couldn't find a facelift 6 pot with the right colour/trim combo and an autobox within budget from the Approved Used scheme anyway.

However, I'm not going to talk about my new car in someone else's thread about a totally different car.

Thumbs up with regards to the Volvo anyway, it's not as good as the BMW, but then you can buy them a lot cheaper, but it's better than a Focus or an Astra or many of it's bigger rivals.

* Fox it doesn't have iDrive, it has an autobox, leather and metallic paint ...I think that's about it for options, it's an SE spec, I suppose I 'could' have stretched to an M sport but tbh I didn't think it was worth it, although you get a better steering wheel and it looks a little better externally ...it does give up ride quality for that, noticeably I found. You'll see it when I post a thread up when I actually get it anyway. My other serious considerations were the Mercedes C 180/200K Auto, the Honda Accord 2.0 Auto, Skoda Superb 1.8T DSG, Octavia vRS and the Golf GTI DSG. The BMW beat them all out, I drove all of them except the 200K variant of the C class, I only drove the C180K and the C class was the only car listed to give the BMW a serious run for it's money, indeed the 320i was the last car of this lot I drove too and I really found it to be the best for various reasons that I would be more than happy to go into when I make a new car thread. The VAG group cars more or less eliminated themselves though due to the DSG box, it's nice enough and very quick to change ...but for my driving style and for refinement I prefer traditional torque converter autos ...leaving the BMW, the Mercedes and the Honda ...BMW knocked the Honda out without much effort ...Mercedes ...ehhh not bad, but not as engaging to drive and the interior isn't as nice. Thus I ended up with a 320i by testing various cars and by process of elimination, there can be only one ...kind of like highlander. I used to find it difficult to appreciate any BMW that wasn't top of the range for what it is, when I drove a 330CI, however, based on my criteria now ...the lower end of the range made a pretty darn good set of reasons for existing. Premium compact executive cars that aren't as expensive to buy or run basically, it doesn't need to be all that fast, just not 'slow' and relaxing to drive with leather, light interior, comfortable seats and a smooth autobox, 'nice' steering and the ability to connect an MP3 without modification.
 
Last edited:
It's almost as if you went out of your way to find the worst possible car in the range. Why a 320i? At least with it being an LCI you'll have the excellent CIC iDrive system to take your mind off the rest :p
 
Although mine is an S, it has a trip computer, cruise control, dual zone climate, steering mounted stereo controls and heated front seats. I would recommend you get either an SE/Lux or an S with the missing bits fitted as options like I did.

tbh none of those area deal breakers for me, especially cruise control, surrounded mostly by single track roads here! heated seats would be nice right enough!
 
Back
Top Bottom