Vote against a SuperMosque at the Olympics site

Shackley · 20 Jul 2007 at 10:54

VIRII said:
So no matter how many times you repeat your lies over WMD they'll still be known to be lies.

Which lies would those be?

Are you suggesting that Saddam Hussein DID in fact have WMD in 2003 and that Bush & Bliar failed to find them or that they did find them but decided to keep quiet about it

Neither of which will alter the lie pushed by the racists on this forum that Ken Livingstone is planning to use tax payer's money to build a SuperMosque at the Olympics site.

wordy · 20 Jul 2007 at 10:56

Anyhoo back to the OP for a moment.

Personally I don't want to see the defining landmark in London as a place of worship for a alien religion that has only reccently taken root here. After all it is designed to be used by a small minority of the countries population.
The biggest landmark in London should be somewhere that is used by everyone, not a minority religous group.

SaintM · 20 Jul 2007 at 10:58

It is strange that it's my 1st post, I thought I had posted before.
I've been a customer of OcUK for a long time and must have registered to post a question in the useful technical forums. I probably found the answer so never needed to post.

Regardless of that though, I'm not sure how you can class me as a troll. Do I not bring up a valid point, or am I 'PC gone mad' incarnate?

cleanbluesky · 20 Jul 2007 at 10:58

@if ®afiq said:
There is a wealth of information out there, but of course as it is not reported in our mainstream media you will not beleive it, so I think it is futile.

Futile for what purpose?
You believe that the information you are 'privy' to is somehow more representative than the information in the 'mass media'?
Why do you see such a significance in what is reported in the mass media?

I have posted many links previously pointing to the distrust of the general population with both governments etc - but they always seem to disappear down the memory hole.

You use Orwellian references despite living in a country that allows you the freedom of religion and politics?

EDIT:
@if, could you explain how terrorist militia groups with a habit of attacking civilians are in fact representative of the Iraqi People?

Shackley · 20 Jul 2007 at 10:59

SaintM said:
It is strange that it's my 1st post, I thought I had posted before.
I've been a customer of OcUK for a long time and must have registered to post a question in the useful technical forums. I probably found the answer so never needed to post.

Regardless of that though, I'm not sure how you can class me as a troll. Do I not bring up a valid point, or am I 'PC gone mad' incarnate?

Say what?

THIS appears to be your first post :confused:

VIRII · 20 Jul 2007 at 11:01

Shackley said:
Which lies would those be?

Are you suggesting that Saddam Hussein DID in fact have WMD in 2003 and that Bush & Bliar failed to find them or that they did find them but decided to keep quiet about it

Neither of which will alter the lie pushed by the racists on this forum that Ken Livingstone is planning to use tax payer's money to build a SuperMosque at the Olympics site.

Your lie is that you claim that Bush etc KNEW that Saddam did NOT have WMD.
Please prove that Bush KNEW there were no WMD.
Then please prove that there are still no WMD.
Failure to find something in such a large desert doesn't mean it is not there somewhere.