VR Benchmarks, 4090v5090 (see link)

Tykey said:
35 mins. Can anyone give a tl;dr? Watched the 1st few mins, seems as though he likes the 5090.
Click to expand...
basically at 100% the results are comparaable between the cards.
but as soon as the res starts increasing i.e. 200/300/400 the 5090 does a much better job of maintaining averables at higher frame rate.
higher bandwidth shows its performance increase.

this time stamp sort of shows example
of descrepencys (red matter 2)

or Kayak VR
slightly differant config display order
 
Last edited:
LostCorpse said:
basically at 100% the results are comparaable between the cards.
but as soon as the res starts increasing i.e. 200/300/400 the 5090 does a much better job of maintaining averables at higher frame rate.
higher bandwidth shows its performance increase.

this time stamp sort of shows example
of descrepencys (red matter 2)

or Kayak VR
slightly differant config display order
Click to expand...
Cheers :)
 
LostCorpse said:
to add : high res headsets = upgrade to 5090
if your on a 4090, its prob not worth it unless you have the ££ to splash.
if your not on a 4090 already then its worth upgrading.
Click to expand...
I wonder if a Q3 is considered a high res headset? Probably not tbh. It's all academic for me now anyway, expecting to pay out all my new gpu money + a good chunk more on something else soon. Still very interesting though, thanks.
 
its the pimax / pimax crystal as example were you have exteme res that its better for.

the q3 was touched on with VD and how good the compositor was ect.

Metro awakening was the biggest descrepincy

smooth motioning kept turning on which was an issue for testing.
 
The vid quoted the Q3 as their baseline, from which the 200, 300 and 400% upscaling was used.

Interesting how his conclusion was that the performance enhancements were the result of the improved memory bandwidth, which is something like 80% faster when comparing the 5090 to the 4090.
I wonder if the same logic can be applied when comparing the 5080 to the 4080, where the bandwidth improvement is more like 25-30%.
 
I'm on a 4080 and a 7800x3d, quest 3, iracing runs so fuggin great it doesn't matter, but for LMU (and maybe the new AC, we'll see) do you guys think CPU or GPU is a better upgrade?

Seeing how ACC has responded to the new DLSS, I wish LMU had it to see if it holds up
 
kute said:
I'm on a 4080 and a 7800x3d, quest 3, iracing runs so fuggin great it doesn't matter, but for LMU (and maybe the new AC, we'll see) do you guys think CPU or GPU is a better upgrade?

Seeing how ACC has responded to the new DLSS, I wish LMU had it to see if it holds up
Click to expand...

That 7800X3D is nice !

i think i need to upgrade my CPU to one of those, but i can get by with what i have
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom