VR Benchmarks, 4090v5090 (see link)

Tykey said:
35 mins. Can anyone give a tl;dr? Watched the 1st few mins, seems as though he likes the 5090.
Click to expand...
basically at 100% the results are comparaable between the cards.
but as soon as the res starts increasing i.e. 200/300/400 the 5090 does a much better job of maintaining averables at higher frame rate.
higher bandwidth shows its performance increase.

this time stamp sort of shows example
of descrepencys (red matter 2)

or Kayak VR
slightly differant config display order
 
Last edited:
LostCorpse said:
basically at 100% the results are comparaable between the cards.
but as soon as the res starts increasing i.e. 200/300/400 the 5090 does a much better job of maintaining averables at higher frame rate.
higher bandwidth shows its performance increase.

this time stamp sort of shows example
of descrepencys (red matter 2)

or Kayak VR
slightly differant config display order
Click to expand...
Cheers :)
 
LostCorpse said:
to add : high res headsets = upgrade to 5090
if your on a 4090, its prob not worth it unless you have the ££ to splash.
if your not on a 4090 already then its worth upgrading.
Click to expand...
I wonder if a Q3 is considered a high res headset? Probably not tbh. It's all academic for me now anyway, expecting to pay out all my new gpu money + a good chunk more on something else soon. Still very interesting though, thanks.
 
its the pimax / pimax crystal as example were you have exteme res that its better for.

the q3 was touched on with VD and how good the compositor was ect.

Metro awakening was the biggest descrepincy

smooth motioning kept turning on which was an issue for testing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom