@Rusty ive got no idea what you're going on about. You're just arguing for the sake of it.
Didn't see it as arguing in truth but it sounds like your backs been up in this whole thread for some reason. Chill out. It's been a good thread.
Nice try pulling the "I dunno what you're talking about when it's been proved I was wrong"

Everything you say is in complete contrast to what Nvidia say on their website.
No it isn't - my image and remarks is based on their website. Your interpretation of what is being said is based on an incorrect understanding of what SLI is. I've already shown via a nice .png file that nVidia distinguish themselves between 2-way, 3-way SLI.
I go back to the original point that i was making. If Nvidia don't think 4k is important...
Where have you got the not important part from? I said there's no market for it and I said they were setting the foundations for 4K adoption because it's in GPU manufacturers interests for there to be a mass 4K adoption.
.... or that 780 SLI is capable of providing playable fps with settings turned up whilst not running out of vram then don't start a PR campaign and plaster it all over your website. Not interested in how you perceive things when its there in black and white on their own website.
It's good that you say it's there in black and white and you're right that perception doesn't come into it. The fact is nVidia explicitly distinguish between 2-way, 3-way and Quad-SLI. SLI doesn't mean two GPUs. It means more than one. I've provided links to this.
Therefore their statement which you have kindly quoted on the previous page is indeed correct. It might be a bit vague - probably purposefully so - as it isn't exactly a good idea saying you're going to need 3x £450 cards to play 4K. It just looks a million miles away and will put people off and as I've explained it's in both AMDs and nVidia's interest that 4K is adopted. The GPU sales as a result helps them both.
You OK now buddy?
