w3c validator doesn't like dynamic url's?

Beansprout · 12 Jul 2006 at 14:28

Spunkey said:
like i said before, some standards are worthwhile, others... not so much

it's down to the developer to realise which can be negated.

How would you work that one out....

"Hmm, today's Tuesday - that's no tag day! Who needs tags?"

"Hmm, today's Wednesday - must be reverse the markup day!"

ad infinitum

z3b3dy · 12 Jul 2006 at 14:57

Beansprout said:
How would you work that one out....

"Hmm, today's Tuesday - that's no tag day! Who needs tags?"

"Hmm, today's Wednesday - must be reverse the markup day!"

ad infinitum

Don't forget about font tag Fridays!

Sic · 12 Jul 2006 at 15:31

Spunkey said:
like i said before, some standards are worthwhile, others... not so much

it's down to the developer to realise which can be negated.

how do you come to that conclusion then? you're not the body that governs html standards, so you don't get to choose. those standards are in place for a reason.

out of morbid curiosity, what other standards do you consider to be worthwhile, and "not so" worthwhile? partially standards-compliant code is not standards-compliant.

Beansprout · 12 Jul 2006 at 15:44

z3b3dy said:
Don't forget about font tag Fridays!

"Boing!"