Want to get back into photography again

D.P. Is the M5 worth £300 more than the M10?

I'm not missing anything important am I?

I don't think so, you are better off putting the money into lenses. in 5 years time there will be a load of new m43 camera with new sensors and technology.
 
Yeah thats my thoughts as well. The £300 can go to a nice prime lens and like you say, keep the lenses, just swap the body for better ones later. :D

Just wanted to make sure I hadnt missed something obvious. I really cant see how Olympus can charge £300 more for a camera which is only slightly better or worse.
 
I don't think so, you are better off putting the money into lenses. in 5 years time there will be a load of new m43 camera with new sensors and technology.

Especially when lenses can have firmware upgrades to enable new technologies/features such as Panasonic have just done to match the DFD/AF improvements in the GX8.
 
Damn i hate it when things look compatible and they arent :(

Its the AF which is swaying me to the newer models to be fair. I suspect thats where I will go.

I did consider the Sony range and have looked at them but the choice of lens don;t seem to be as good as the olympus/panasonic (plus sigma) range plus the ability to use old skool lenses with manual focus.

Plus isnt the A7 a full frame camera? Wont that mean big heavy lenses again? I dont want to go back to how I was lugging around a great big camera bag which weighed several kilos.

EDIT: Just looked at the lens cost for the A7. Even the basic typical short zoom is almost £500! :O

AF at the moment on the smaller cameras is no match for a DSLR.
However any sports or wild life related I take my DSLR, for everything else my Sony NEX 5R is good enough !
 
2nd hand on eBay. Only 4 months old and yeah was a bargain since the batteries would be an extra £120 and the grips is £200 new (although £100 2nd hand) so I paid only £400 max for the body, probably less.

I'm not that bothered about new. Always good bargains to be had on eBay :)
 
Back
Top Bottom