I have 2 x 27" screens (both 1080p 60Hz)
I was looking to get a 32" screen but I feel I'd be losing some screen real estate with "only" 32" widescreen
Is 34" a better option going from 2 to 1 screen?
Anyone went from 2 to 1 and what size screen did you get to replace it?
Depends on what resolution you go to really.
32" 4k will give you exactly the same width, and double the height in terms of pixels, physical height will be more, but will be significantly smaller in terms of width.
34" ultrawide 1440p will give you 400 pixels less width (3840 vs 3440) and 360 pixels more height (1080 vs 1440), physical height will stay the same, but width will be narrower.
38" ultrawide will give you the same width and 50% more height in terms of pixels, and will again be bigger in terms of physical height, but not as wide.
Basically, all the options will give you more pixels, but less physical size.
I switch between 2x24" 1080p in the office and single 34" at home. I much prefer the ultrawide, but do sometimes miss the full width of the 2x 1080p screens when working. I did have a 38" for a while which was fantastic, but am in the process of replacing it with the 34" Alienware - will probably keep the 27" 1440p I'm currently using as a 2nd monitor for work.
It also depends on your usage, UW is so much better for gaming (if you can run it - it will be a significant decrease in performance vs a single 1080p screen), and while it is perfectly usable for work purposes, if productivity was your sole usage I'd probably go for the 32" 4k, or at least keep one of your current monitors as well.
