War with Iran

[TW]Fox;21698506 said:
Ironically even Iran had a go at attacking Iraq's nuclear facilities..

They didn't just have a go they succeeded but the French repaired it (they didn't repair it again after the Israeli attack as they lost workers in that attack). Ironically the Iran attack was at the request of Israel (Iraq had just invaded Iran at this point so they didn't need much persuading). Iran also provided Israel with intelligence for their raid and gave them permission to land in Iran if their fighter bombers were cut off from making it back to Israeli airspace following the strike.
 
All these conspiracies about the illuminati or Israel are just excuses, simple theories that give a name, and a face to the silent enemy which is our own greed, intolerance, and complacency. Maybe WW3 will happen, if nukes start falling, theres not going to be much of this place left..
 
Maybe WW3 will happen, if nukes start falling, theres not going to be much of this place left..

If it makes you feel better, while its has been possible to completely level everything within the M25 with a single nuke since the 1950's its almost unthinkable that any country would ever commit to the use of such weapons in this day and age, not for any moral reason (of which the are many) but because its strategically pointless.

The bombs dropped on Japan were designed as a shock and awe tactic and were used not to kill but to save lives as Japan had never surrendered and would have fought to the last man if the allies had been forced to invade the mainland, this would have caused many many more deaths on both sides than the nuclear weapons did.

Old style large atomic bombs carried by planes have been replaced nowadays by smaller nuclear warheads carried by missiles which are not as effective but more precise. And in the day of satellite surveillance you don't need massive explosions to ensure you get your target you just need precision hits.

Added to that nukes are pretty obsolete now as we can build fuel air bombs (conventional weapons) even more destructive than the WW2 nukes and the whole idea of nukes is pointless for anything other than striking fear into your enemy.
 
If it makes you feel better, while its has been possible to completely level everything within the M25 with a single nuke since the 1950's its almost unthinkable that any country would ever commit to the use of such weapons in this day and age, not for any moral reason (of which the are many) but because its strategically pointless.

The bombs dropped on Japan were designed as a shock and awe tactic and were used not to kill but to save lives as Japan had never surrendered and would have fought to the last man if the allies had been forced to invade the mainland, this would have caused many many more deaths on both sides than the nuclear weapons did.

Old style large atomic bombs carried by planes have been replaced nowadays by smaller nuclear warheads carried by missiles which are not as effective but more precise. And in the day of satellite surveillance you don't need massive explosions to ensure you get your target you just need precision hits.

Added to that nukes are pretty obsolete now as we can build fuel air bombs (conventional weapons) even more destructive than the WW2 nukes and the whole idea of nukes is pointless for anything other than striking fear into your enemy.

That's all fine and dandy, unless you're dealing with nut jobs.
 
Back
Top Bottom