• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Warhammer Total War Bench Thread

Maxwell Titan @1462/2002
5960X @4.4
372.90 Drivers

DX12

1080p
U0GscUQ.jpg



1440p
HnPhTCO.jpg



1600p
nHKOWRT.jpg



2160p
32ku3mm.jpg
 
Kap why do you run different cpu speeds for amd and nvidia, shouldn't you do them both at the same speeds, 4ghz or 4.4ghz on your 6950x

At those fps it won't make any difference.

If you overclock a CPU and it does not need it you can actually lower the score as the PC does not need it and it can lead to inefficiency.

Running a CPU @4.0 instead of 4.4 is not a factor when the GPU is only managing 29fps.

Here is an example of what I mean,

This is what I used for the bench thread

RX 480 @1380/2200
6950X @4.0
16.9.2 Drivers
1080p

DX11
QtTL5vn.jpg




And here is the same settings but with the CPU @4.4

CpMiR9P.jpg
 
Last edited:
GTX 1060. Kaap, would it be possible to bench once with more normal settings and see how much you need to drop in order to achieve 60fps with the 1060?
 
GTX 1080(s) Single Card tests: 2100/2725 -- SLI: 2050/2725
i7 5960x @ 4.6GHz
372.70 drivers

1080p

DX11
78.2 fps Average
1080p_DX11.jpg

DX12
66.8 fps Average
1080p_DX12.jpg

SLI - DX11
122.6 fps Average
1080p_SLI.jpg

3440 x 1440

DX11
38.8 fps Average
3440_x_1440_DX11.jpg

DX12
32 fps Average
3440_x_1440_DX12.jpg

SLI - DX11
70.2 fps Average
3440_x_1440_SLI.jpg

I expect our results with SLI 1080p resolution is as close as they are as there is a CPU bottleneck at that point. My 5960x was maxed out on a core and no doubt likely the case with your 6950x which explains how the 1080's even slightly behind your Pascal TX's come that close to one another.

Would be neat to see a Skylake 6700k OC'd with a Titan X Pascal SLI or 1080 SLI and see how that fares and if its better IPC helps.
 
GTX 1080(s) Single Card tests: 2100/2725 -- SLI: 2050/2725
i7 5960x @ 4.6GHz
372.70 drivers

1080p

DX11
78.2 fps Average
1080p_DX11.jpg

DX12
66.8 fps Average
1080p_DX12.jpg

SLI - DX11
122.6 fps Average
1080p_SLI.jpg

3440 x 1440

DX11
38.8 fps Average
3440_x_1440_DX11.jpg

DX12
32 fps Average
3440_x_1440_DX12.jpg

SLI - DX11
70.2 fps Average
3440_x_1440_SLI.jpg

I expect our results with SLI 1080p resolution is as close as they are as there is a CPU bottleneck at that point. My 5960x was maxed out on a core and no doubt likely the case with your 6950x which explains how the 1080's even slightly behind your Pascal TX's come that close to one another.

Would be neat to see a Skylake 6700k OC'd with a Titan X Pascal SLI or 1080 SLI and see how that fares and if its better IPC helps.

It is a very bad bottleneck @1080p with 2 cards.:)

Scoreboard updated.:)
 
GTX 1060. Kaap, would it be possible to bench once with more normal settings and see how much you need to drop in order to achieve 60fps with the 1060?

Not for the scoreboard

Stock FE 1060
6950X @4.0
372.90 Drivers
1080p

Settings - no AA gets it over 60fps
gL7kSRj.jpg


1080p
IzfxwPr.jpg
 
Last edited:
It is a very bad bottleneck @1080p with 2 cards.:)

Scoreboard updated.:)

Yup.

Tried the Nano at the game, was hoping DX12 would add some gain, but seems not :(

4690k @ 4.7 Ghz -- R9 Nano @ 1100MHz / 550MHz

1080p

DX11 - 37.7 fps
2s9du06.jpg
[/IMG]

DX12 - 36.4 fps
281spzn.jpg
[/IMG]
 
Yup.

Tried the Nano at the game, was hoping DX12 would add some gain, but seems not :(

4690k @ 4.7 Ghz -- R9 Nano @ 1100MHz / 550MHz

1080p

DX11 - 37.7 fps
2s9du06.jpg
[/IMG]

DX12 - 36.4 fps
281spzn.jpg
[/IMG]

Could you confirm which drivers you were using please.

Scoreboard updated.:)
 
Back
Top Bottom