Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Kap why do you run different cpu speeds for amd and nvidia, shouldn't you do them both at the same speeds, 4ghz or 4.4ghz on your 6950x
GTX 1080 @ GPU 2151/MEM 2628
i7 6700k @ 4.5ghz
372.90 drivers
DX12
1080p @ 94.8fps
![]()
1440p @ 75.8fps
![]()
GTX 1080(s) Single Card tests: 2100/2725 -- SLI: 2050/2725
i7 5960x @ 4.6GHz
372.70 drivers
1080p
DX11
78.2 fps Average
![]()
DX12
66.8 fps Average
![]()
SLI - DX11
122.6 fps Average
![]()
3440 x 1440
DX11
38.8 fps Average
![]()
DX12
32 fps Average
![]()
SLI - DX11
70.2 fps Average
![]()
I expect our results with SLI 1080p resolution is as close as they are as there is a CPU bottleneck at that point. My 5960x was maxed out on a core and no doubt likely the case with your 6950x which explains how the 1080's even slightly behind your Pascal TX's come that close to one another.
Would be neat to see a Skylake 6700k OC'd with a Titan X Pascal SLI or 1080 SLI and see how that fares and if its better IPC helps.
GTX 1060. Kaap, would it be possible to bench once with more normal settings and see how much you need to drop in order to achieve 60fps with the 1060?
It is a very bad bottleneck @1080p with 2 cards.
Scoreboard updated.![]()
Not for the scoreboard
Stock FE 1060
6950X @4.0
372.90 Drivers
1080p
Settings - no AA gets it over 60fps
![]()
1080p
![]()
Yup.
Tried the Nano at the game, was hoping DX12 would add some gain, but seems not![]()
4690k @ 4.7 Ghz -- R9 Nano @ 1100MHz / 550MHz
1080p
DX11 - 37.7 fps
[/IMG]![]()
DX12 - 36.4 fps
[/IMG]![]()