... was it faked?

Phantom · 17 Mar 2006 at 21:26

...the moon landing that is! theres a documentary thats just started on channel 5 about it and theyre about to attempt to build their own "fake landing" on earth.

some have said we werent technologically advanced back then... what do you think?

ImMrChris · 17 Mar 2006 at 21:27

turns TV to channel 5

RandomTom · 17 Mar 2006 at 21:28

how obvious was this thread going to be about the moon landing, and I think it was faked, or mediated for an audience to add belief.

Tomsk · 17 Mar 2006 at 21:29

The moon landing was real.

The internet is a figment of your imagination.

ALLI · 17 Mar 2006 at 21:29

who REALLY cares? makes no diff to my life whether it was fake or not. there's jack diddly there.

we need to sort this planet out before sodding off to ruin another one.

ALLI · 17 Mar 2006 at 21:30

tomsk... nearly 60,000 posts?

do you not work ar kid??

Eliot · 17 Mar 2006 at 21:31

Tomsk said:
The moon landing was real.

The internet is a figment of your imagination.

all i can say is since when is there wind on the moon armstrong?

ElRazur · 17 Mar 2006 at 21:31

Phantom said:
...the moon landing that is! theres a documentary thats just started on channel 5 about it and theyre about to attempt to build their own "fake landing" on earth.

some have said we werent technologically advanced back then... what do you think?

It is real, the concluding evidence for me was the device place on the moon and regularly transmist signal to the receiver on earth, so as to measure if we are moving out of our solar axis or not by NASA.

Memphis · 17 Mar 2006 at 21:34

There is so much evidence that the landing was real, it's not worth even contemplating it being fake.

Al Vallario · 17 Mar 2006 at 21:34

I'm pretty sure I've seen this programme before, just the same old conspiracy theories!

ALLI said:
tomsk... nearly 60,000 posts?
do you not work ar kid??

Seems he won one of the charity auctions

Beansprout · 17 Mar 2006 at 21:35

Christ, it was real.

If armchair theorist idiots want to waste their own time and get off on their own pathetic theories because they're inadequate then that's fine by me.

ALLI · 17 Mar 2006 at 21:35

Al Vallario said:
I'm pretty sure I've seen this programme before, just the same old conspiracy theories!

Seems he won one of the charity auctions

que?

a charity auction to buy a set of digits??? you ARE pullin my plonka arent you?

Memphis · 17 Mar 2006 at 21:37

ALLI said:
que?

a charity auction to buy a set of digits??? you ARE pullin my plonka arent you?

No he's not. And given money went to charity, I don't see the confusion.

Raikiri · 17 Mar 2006 at 21:37

ALLI said:
que?

a charity auction to buy a set of digits??? you ARE pullin my plonka arent you?

I dread to think what your plonka is...

ALLI · 17 Mar 2006 at 21:38

Memphis said:
No he's not. And given money went to charity, I don't see the confusion.

Chill winston.

ALLI · 17 Mar 2006 at 21:40

Raikiri said:
I dread to think what your plonka is...

You don't know what a plonka is?

Cue school kid taunting....

Raikiri · 17 Mar 2006 at 21:41

ALLI said:
You don't know what a plonka is?

Cue school kid taunting....

Hmmm, Plonka is actually a US surname. Theres a site dedicated to it

cheets64 · 17 Mar 2006 at 21:42

Dust still under the eagle.

No stars from photo in space.

Raikiri · 17 Mar 2006 at 21:43

cheets64 said:
Dust still under the eagle.

No stars from photo in space.

Matching landscapes from supposedly diferent angles, 'crosshair' thingies going behind objects like they have been put there afterwards and so on

lemonkettaz · 17 Mar 2006 at 21:44

the stars is the best one