Soldato
- Joined
- 10 May 2004
- Posts
- 12,975
- Location
- Sunny Stafford
Just saw this Beeb article.
I can't really remember Watership Down (saw it in the late 80s), but what in it would make that a PG now and a U back then? The Beeb article says it's "arguably too strong", but that sentence comes to me as being subjective. One person's verdict as a PG might still be considered as a U for the general population. Too subjective.
Also, I wondered what caused the most recent Disney films to become PG e.g. Frozen and Tangled? Hell, I even have 2 copies of Lilo & Stitch. The 1st copy says U and the 2nd says PG wtf. Granted, I'm not very good with 18-rated graphic horror, but for lesser ratings, are we just becoming a bunch of wimps who choose to be offended (rather than being genuinely offended)?
BBC News said:The U-rated 1978 film Watership Down would be classified PG were it released today, the new head of the British Board of Film Classification has said.
![]()
I can't really remember Watership Down (saw it in the late 80s), but what in it would make that a PG now and a U back then? The Beeb article says it's "arguably too strong", but that sentence comes to me as being subjective. One person's verdict as a PG might still be considered as a U for the general population. Too subjective.
Also, I wondered what caused the most recent Disney films to become PG e.g. Frozen and Tangled? Hell, I even have 2 copies of Lilo & Stitch. The 1st copy says U and the 2nd says PG wtf. Granted, I'm not very good with 18-rated graphic horror, but for lesser ratings, are we just becoming a bunch of wimps who choose to be offended (rather than being genuinely offended)?