WD Ultrastar DC HC520 / HGST He12 50% slower in the middle

Associate
Joined
19 Jan 2020
Posts
2
The WD Ultrastar DC HC520 / HGST He12 should have a transfer rate of 243MiB/sec.
This is true for the first two TBs, but than it degrades to only 50% in the center of the drive.

Used the following script to run 5 cycles. For each cycle measured the transfer rate at each start of a TB.

Code:
    #!/bin/bash
    for run in 1 2 3 4 5
    do
        for i in 11 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
        do
            echo "RUN=$run SKIP=$i"
            b=`expr 1024 \* 10`k
            s=`expr $i \* 100`KB
            c=`expr 1024 \* 1`
            dd if=/dev/sdg bs=$b iflag=direct skip=$s count=$c status=none | pv -b -t -r >/dev/null
            /usr/sbin/smartctl -a /dev/sdg | grep ^194     # show temperature
            echo
        done
    done

Each cycle showed the same transfer rate (there was no variation) at a specific TB start, independent of temperature.

SKIP=0 10.0GiB 0:00:42 [ 242MiB/s]
SKIP=1 10.0GiB 0:00:42 [ 242MiB/s]
SKIP=2 10.0GiB 0:00:43 [ 235MiB/s]
SKIP=3 10.0GiB 0:00:45 [ 226MiB/s]
SKIP=4 10.0GiB 0:00:46 [ 220MiB/s]
SKIP=5 10.0GiB 0:00:48 [ 210MiB/s]
SKIP=6 10.0GiB 0:00:50 [ 202MiB/s]
SKIP=7 10.0GiB 0:00:53 [ 192MiB/s]
SKIP=8 10.0GiB 0:00:57 [ 178MiB/s]
SKIP=9 10.0GiB 0:01:01 [ 166MiB/s]
SKIP=10 10.0GiB 0:01:08 [ 149MiB/s]
SKIP=11 10.0GiB 0:01:18 [ 129MiB/s]

RUN=1 33Celsius
RUN=2 39Celsius
RUN=3 42Celsius
RUN=4 43Celsius
RUN=5 44Celsius

Did somebody else notice this 50% drop of transfer rate for these drives?
Did you receive a sustainable transfer rate through the drive?
Hope to have some users running my script and showing their results for similar drives.
 
Last edited:
Mechanical drives are slower on the inside of the platter than on the outside as it has less surface area to read at the same rotational speed. So, completely normal. Also, boo hoo at the slowest speed being 130mB/s. People today don't know how good they have it :p
 
Back
Top Bottom