Soldato
- Joined
- 13 Aug 2004
- Posts
- 8,367
- Location
- England
XFCE as the crouton guide recommended it as a lightweight enviroment compared to unity. Glad I installed it as I've found Ubuntu to be ace.
Just switched to cinnamon 2.4 for my Backbox4, massive performance increase over xfce for gaming and especially Wine gaming. Even though I hate the UI I will stick with it until xfce catches up.
BTW, whats with the "*buntu"? I can understand why with *nix, but not Ubuntu.
So the star refers to the different DE's, surely that should read "*ubuntu" then?Ubuntu, Lubuntu, Xubuntu, Kubuntu, Edubuntu...that's why. The first four are simply difference desktop environments (Unity, LXDE, XFCE, KDE). The rest are the "weird" ones that aren't typically used for desktop installations (or simply don't go with the *buntu nickname, like Ubuntu GNOME).
So the star refers to the different DE's, surely that should read "*ubuntu" then?
Am I being too pedantic?
You can still choose Gnome as DE at install on Ubuntu right?
I don't think so. You can install any DE you want over Ubuntu (or any distro) though. The various spins are just so you don't have half a dozen DEs over the top of each other.
Some distros also do a better job of implementing DEs. Fedora for Gnome, OpenSuSE for KDE, Xubuntu for XFCE.
I still use Ubuntu Gnome over Fedora though, because I'm stuck in my ways with Debian package management.
Gnome shell on fedora
XFCE on Manjaro
tbh rpm is one of the few things i dont like about fedora give me good old debs anyday, i do like the standard and up to date packages though without the ubuntu specific patches that bring on strange dependencies (seriously ubuntu who makes parts of gnome depend on qt5?!?)I've been running this a couple days to give it another chance and I'm smitten. *.rpm package management still seems weird to me, but, yum is great and easy to use (printed out a cheat sheet with lots of stuff to replace APT commands) and it even has rpmorphan to replace deborphan.