Damn, that's pretty much verbatim what I was going to say. That was the first thing that came to mind when I read the (admittedly stupid) saying.Weird, I thought that having your legs crossed would refer to being in a sitting position, therefore you can't change the world unless you get up off your arse and do something, so stop sitting there with your legs crossed.
Clearly it is on an entirely different level, aimed at women in business, and referring to don't sit meekly by, and watch opportunity run away from you.
Yes, but they know they'll never be taken to court over it as the claimants wouldn't have a leg to stand on.How crass, do they not realise how insensitive that is to employees with no legs...?
Yes, but they know they'll never be taken to court over it as the claimants wouldn't have a leg to stand on.
What was the context of that phase? What followed it?
We had a work email the other day (you know the ones, spammed to every single employee worldwide) aimed at empowering women in the workplace.
All cool I think to myself, I'm happy for gender equality, women's rights etc. So I started reading, and the first line said "You can’t change the world with your legs crossed”...
I can't begin to imagine why someone thought that was appropriate!
How crass, do they not realise how insensitive that is to employees with no legs or who don't have the use of their legs?