As a side note, Optimum did a great video highlighting the current state of makers and gamers "wanting" higher polling rate, even though even under controlled conditions, the benefits are so small that you'd never notice them in practice. So the gist is to stick to 1000-2000Hz and set your DPI/CPI accordingly. So my age old 1000Hz @ 1000CPI a year before I even saw this video was bang on the money (I'm on a 175Hz display at 144Hz for ref). And those differences are measured on a 540Hz display in the video below, so lower refresh displays will see an even lower difference.
What this made clear is that comfort, battery life and other features trump polling rate. Like some mice had awful bulky dongles that need to be connected via a flying cable on the desk as they're too big to plug into a USB port on the mobo or back of your monitor - That would be a massive issue for me and these are the kind of dongles you get with Razer/WLmouse etc. Whereas my XM2we has a tiny little 1000Hz dongle that sites happily in any USB port.
I even ordered then cancelled the new Turtlebeach Burst Air II and the new Razer V3 Pro after realising that I'd not really be gaining anything by changing to those mice from the XM2we lol.
I've since ordered a set of grip tapes pre-cut for the XM2 to enhance the feel and add protection from the plastic getting shiny over time as I really do like this mouse, it's light and super responsive and the battery lasts weeks before needing a charge so can't sniff at that.
For me I reckon the dream ratio will be a 1000Hz monitor, 1000Hz polling rate, 1000CPI/DPI resolution. That's not that far off really given we now have 480Hz OLEDs