Soldato
- Joined
- 6 Feb 2010
- Posts
- 14,583
I think you completely missed my point. If budget is an issue, the best way forward would still be upgrading the graphic card first as that is the biggest shortcoming and just overclock his existing system for now. If budget ain't an issue, then of course a whole new system would make sense.It is absolutely not worth getting a Vega, 1070 or 1080 and a new monitor on that old platform. The OP would be wasting money because so much performance of the new GPU would be chucked away. I have first hand experience of a CPU from that era (i7 860 overclocked from the factory 2.8GHz to 4.0GHz) bottlenecking an R9 290, a 5 year old GPU! This was at 1080p resolution mind you, and we are talking about higher resolution here, thus shifting more work on to the GPU. That said, the CPU is just too old to make this upgrade worthwhile. Don't forget, 2009 is almost 10 years ago...
For example, just switching from that old overclocked i7 to a stock 6600k doubled the minimum and average frame rates of quite a few games on the same R9 290!
Also if he is going for 1440 res, there CPU bottleneck would be much less than for 1080 res.
Also CPU bottleneck has always been a thing, but it's largely depending on the games you are playing on. For games that use all 4 threads/cores the CPU bottleneck tends to be a lesser issue, whereas games that using dated game engine that would not scaled 1~2 threads/core (like some RTS and mmorpg that are CPU demanding), then obviously the CPU bottleneck would be much more significant.