• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

What recorder is more CPU intensive?

Associate
Joined
9 Oct 2012
Posts
48
Hi
I have fraps at the moment but I am thinking of getting game broadcaster for the live streaming because I lag to much when I use xsplit and I think it is due to my CPU. When recording with fraps I don't lag so I was wondering if game broadcaster will make it lag more or less than fraps if I was streaming so I can make a decision on wether to get it.
Thanks
Jeremy
 
Any form of steaming software is going to be very CPU intensive due to the fact you are playing a game, recording it, encoding it then transferring it over a network.

I used to run a GTX260, AMD6000+ with 4GB DDR2 800, FRAPS ran fine in most games but xpslit make my games crawl to the point of unplayable.

So me personally would say if you can't run 1 type of live streaming software you are going to have problems with the majority, since most are similiar. Also Xsplit is actually the most resource hungry.
 
Game broadcaster is not a piece of software it is hardware for inside my computer. You may have heard of the Live Broadcaster HD it is like that but does not do all the encoding inside it.
 
Game broadcaster is not a piece of software it is hardware for inside my computer. You may have heard of the Live Broadcaster HD it is like that but does not do all the encoding inside it.

Learn something new everyday, didn't know that! :p

I have never used anything like that, the ones I have used are all software based and normally cause hell on my CPU :)
 
Back
Top Bottom