What the hell is wrong with our justice system!!

I know I know. I am trying, I am getting sweet FA in my searches though..
Pulling my own hair out here as I don't believe it's fake.
 
Fuzz said:
I know I know. I am trying, I am getting sweet FA in my searches though..
Pulling my own hair out here as I don't believe it's fake.
Click to expand...

Contact the The Walter Mitty Hunters Club on Facebook and ask them if the link in question is genuine and if they have any knowledge of any of the names that appear in the article.
 
Fuzz said:
Rape, violence, evading the CSA from what I can gather.
Most of it isn't gone into deeply as it states in the thread for "legal reasons" they can't.. I guess libel / defamation, who knows but as far as I can tell it's all real!
Click to expand...

Libel and defamation do not apply if it's true/you've got proof and especially if it's demonstrably true and recorded as such in court records.
For example if I said someone was a rapist but had no proof it would be libel/defamation, if I said it and the person had a conviction for it I would be 100% protected.
 
LOL a friend on twitter who had a near miss with this man many years ago but didn't know anything about this page until today.

@JayMeW if you wish to read her tweets about it tonight..
Also looks like some other women have popped up in reply and said they'd had a run in with him too!
 
Fuzz said:
Do NONE of our police forces link information with each other for Christ sake!
Click to expand...

Yes.

If he's really been convicted of all those offences, it'll all be on PNC linked to his fingerprints. If he fails to sign the sex offenders register, or doesn't comply with the requirements (which are usually very strict) he commits an offence and would be shown wanted. If he gets arrested, all his previous offences would be found, name change or not. That information would then be passed to the courts.

If a force was given information that he'd started a new relationship, and he really has that many convictions for domestic abuse, the force would likely do a disclosure under Clare's Law to his new partner too.
 
Fuzz said:
[..]
Do NONE of our police forces link information with each other for Christ sake!
Click to expand...

Of course they do. The idea that someone with multiple convictions and current arrest warrants could simply trot off to another part of the country, change their name and do it again without any consequences is implausible. It's 2015, not 1015. And yes, he would have current arrest warrants if he broke so many of the legal restrictions that it has been claimed are being applied to him. If, for example, a registered sex offender who must regularly check in with the police fails to do so, it's not routinely ignored.
 
russell664 said:
Don't believe everything you see on the internet. :p
Click to expand...

Yes I know that but the woman I follow on twitter isn't the type to make up stuff. (followed her for years)
Damn this is annoying not being able to find anything though, I will admit.
She has also said she found it strange that nothing came up in a google search either.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom