what would be the worst way to go?
- Thread starter cm1179
- Start date
Tbh, one of the worst ways I can think of is drowning =/.
Like that scene in the film Pearl Harbour when they're stuck in the capsized ships and the waters filling up and they can't escape, knowing you're trapped you can't get out you're going to die a death where you hold your breath for so long that you have to release you have to breath out only to inhale a cool salt liquid into your lungs and die as a result.
That's bad.
Like that scene in the film Pearl Harbour when they're stuck in the capsized ships and the waters filling up and they can't escape, knowing you're trapped you can't get out you're going to die a death where you hold your breath for so long that you have to release you have to breath out only to inhale a cool salt liquid into your lungs and die as a result.
That's bad.
Soldato
- Joined
- 1 May 2003
- Posts
- 11,203
Burned alive, or being eaten by an animal 
Barrymore's pool
and straight in at number 1!
Drowning is supposed to be OK. My Mum knew someone who almost died drowning, he said after the initial panic is over and you take the first lungful of water it felt like he was drunk only better and he felt totally at peace. He was revivied and lived to tell the tale, obviously.
Cocaine, bum fun, dip in the pool.............there are worse ways to go.Barrymore's pool
The worst way to die realistically? Some kind of organ failure probably. Wrecked liver, maybe.
My vote is being eaten alive by a shark, having chunk by chunk torn from your body before you either die of blood loss or massive trauma. A lion or big cat wouldn't be so bad because they tend to kill you before they sit down to dinner.
I was thinking about this today. You'd probably die before every scrap of flesh was cut off. I think you might die of shock before even a t-shirt sized chunk of skin was removed.
Soldato
- Joined
- 4 Aug 2008
- Posts
- 4,936
- Location
- Manchester.
Torture would be much worse than drowning or suffocation.
It would be a bit bad but not painful or anything, you would just not be able to breath until you passed out or took a big gulp of water. It would be more panic and not wanting to die.
Where as if someone was sick enough they could do all sorts of crazy painful things to you for years before you die. In the end you might consider death the better option
It would be a bit bad but not painful or anything, you would just not be able to breath until you passed out or took a big gulp of water. It would be more panic and not wanting to die.
Where as if someone was sick enough they could do all sorts of crazy painful things to you for years before you die. In the end you might consider death the better option
I don't think torture should count as it doesnt really kill you.Torture would be much worse than drowning or suffocation.
It would be a bit bad but not painful or anything, you would just not be able to breath until you passed out or took a big gulp of water. It would be more panic and not wanting to die.
Where as if someone was sick enough they could do all sorts of crazy painful things to you for years before you die. In the end you might consider death the better option
I lolled.
One of the worst ways I imagine would be by beheading.
Oooh I forgot about that one, I reckon it's only as bad as getting your throat slit though, you would probably be dead before you felt them hacking through the spine
or at least passed out.
Last edited: