I sold all my gear about 6 months ago with the plan of getting a 5D and some new lenses in November when I was in the US. However, just before I left I heard rumours of a replacement for the 5D and held off. I wanted a full frame camera.
Now, I have just bought a Canon EOS 30 35mm SLR with a Sigma 24-70 f/2.8. It's a pleasure to use and to be honest I think it will fulfill my full frame fetish for now. There is one problem though - getting the pictures onto the computer isn't easy. I have to wait until I use a full film before I can send it off to the lab for processing where I can get them scanned onto CD. This is perfectly fine for the occasional shot but I want to be able to fiddle with shots as soon as I get in.
As it stands I have £800 (can stretch to a grand) and I have a few options:
1. Buy a Canon 5D body. Use it with the Sigma 24-70 until I have enough money to get more lenses.
2. Buy a second hand 30D body for about £400-ish. This leaves me about £400 for a lens - probably the 70-200mm f/4 L. This will get me back into digital as well as expand my lens collection.
3. Get a 20D for about £250-300, a 70-200f/4 L.
4. Stick with the film body and spend the £800 on lenses - probably 70-200mm f/4 L and a Sigma 12-24mm with the change going towards a film scanner or towards processing costs.
The 20/30D is a very tempting option as I can sell it as and when the 5D replacement comes out and shouldn't lose too much money on it. Having looked at eBay there aren't a great deal of them for sale and they seem to be going for more than they are worth on a lot of occasions.
As for the difference between the 20D and 30D. Is there much? How do they compare as far as image quality goes? I used a 400D before, would the 20D be on par or better than it?
What would you do? Any suggestions which I have not mentioned?
Thanks.
Now, I have just bought a Canon EOS 30 35mm SLR with a Sigma 24-70 f/2.8. It's a pleasure to use and to be honest I think it will fulfill my full frame fetish for now. There is one problem though - getting the pictures onto the computer isn't easy. I have to wait until I use a full film before I can send it off to the lab for processing where I can get them scanned onto CD. This is perfectly fine for the occasional shot but I want to be able to fiddle with shots as soon as I get in.
As it stands I have £800 (can stretch to a grand) and I have a few options:
1. Buy a Canon 5D body. Use it with the Sigma 24-70 until I have enough money to get more lenses.
2. Buy a second hand 30D body for about £400-ish. This leaves me about £400 for a lens - probably the 70-200mm f/4 L. This will get me back into digital as well as expand my lens collection.
3. Get a 20D for about £250-300, a 70-200f/4 L.
4. Stick with the film body and spend the £800 on lenses - probably 70-200mm f/4 L and a Sigma 12-24mm with the change going towards a film scanner or towards processing costs.
The 20/30D is a very tempting option as I can sell it as and when the 5D replacement comes out and shouldn't lose too much money on it. Having looked at eBay there aren't a great deal of them for sale and they seem to be going for more than they are worth on a lot of occasions.
As for the difference between the 20D and 30D. Is there much? How do they compare as far as image quality goes? I used a 400D before, would the 20D be on par or better than it?
What would you do? Any suggestions which I have not mentioned?
Thanks.

.