Yes i have seen the clip, the point was deluded, she is deluded, total nonsence.
Indeed.
Yes i have seen the clip, the point was deluded, she is deluded, total nonsence.
Stupid people on TV.
"I don't like geographical names"
"....Your child's called India"
"But that's not related to a location"
And that's the point I stopped watching.
Yes i have seen the clip, the point was deluded, she is deluded, total nonsense.
To be fair she has a point - there are too many chavvy names/parents out there.
To be fair she has a point - there are too many chavvy names/parents out there.
I think that people that look like her should be classified as horse…
Did she not say she hated geographical names, and someone pointed out her daughter is called India?
A foolish woman who is just seeking attention.
Actually, I've done statistical analysis on large data-sets & have found a number of strong correlations between just first name & a number of factors.
Age, socio-economic class, propensity to get into debt, employment status, product selection, tenure & a whole host of other dimensions.
Not that I'd use them in real life mind, but if I got a message from somebody called say.. "Kayleigh" I could guess reasonably accurately (much better than random) the location, age & socio-economic class.
Obviously we don't look for this kind of thing specifically, but when creating predictive models it spits out these things amongst the rule-sets (we then filter out the ones we should not use on ethical discriminatory grounds).
Ironically, the better social mobility is within an area, the less use name is to predict these variables (when say comparing UK, Wales, Scotland) - in a great society with perfect social mobility it would be useless.
I don't know any thin or hot Clairs but to be fair, thin and hot tends to be a minority in woman I actually know. I think I need to move.