• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Whats it mean when

Caporegime
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
39,322
Location
Ireland
I run the sp2004 test and one core seems to be behind in doing the calculations compared to the other core?

Example:

core-speeds.jpg


As of right now the core on the right is onto the second test in that catagory and other one on the left is still doing test 6 of the 14k catagory.
 
Soldato
Joined
10 Apr 2004
Posts
13,489
Normal with Conroe, probably normal with AMD too.

One core is slightly quicker than the other, gets more mem b/w or has the most choice in operations or something.
 
Permabanned
Joined
28 Oct 2006
Posts
6,552
Location
Bournemouth
yes its all down to windows choosing which core to do what on, and as iteration is not one thing but multipole calculations each calc will go to a core, and it wont be 100% 50-50 as you can see there

as long as it reports both cores to be the right speed and its stable then you have nothing to wory about
 
Caporegime
OP
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
39,322
Location
Ireland
ty :)

Always wondered about that, sometimes when i was stress testing it seemed the core that was behind was always the one to fail so i assumed this was a sign of a core not being able to handle the clockspeeds. :)
 
Soldato
Joined
5 Jan 2003
Posts
5,001
Location
West Midlands
FrostedNipple said:
yes its all down to windows choosing which core to do what on, and as iteration is not one thing but multipole calculations each calc will go to a core, and it wont be 100% 50-50 as you can see there

as long as it reports both cores to be the right speed and its stable then you have nothing to wory about

Actually thats wrong, That test specifically says what core its running on, so it very likely automatically sets affinity correctly for each core, so it doesnt keep jumping from core to core.

However, dont forget that windows is running too, and that uses cpu power, so in addition to the tests, you probably have at least 20 other 'windows' background and housekeeping tasks running, which will cause the cores to have a slightly different performance, depending on how much background work is going on.
 
Man of Honour
Joined
14 Nov 2005
Posts
10,661
Location
Up North
Corasik said:
However, dont forget that windows is running too, and that uses cpu power, so in addition to the tests, you probably have at least 20 other 'windows' background and housekeeping tasks running, which will cause the cores to have a slightly different performance, depending on how much background work is going on.

Q F T
 
Back
Top Bottom