• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Which 5090?

Soldato
Joined
26 Jul 2004
Posts
3,452
Location
Thunderdome
Which of the two cards seems best from an ownership pov:

Asus GeForce RTX 5090 ROG Astral OC White 32GB​


MSI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 32GB SUPRIM SOC​


So excluding silly purchase costs, which has the best perceived build quality, most effective cooling system and anticipated longterm reliability/better RMA process? I’m particularly focused on not melting any cables, but both seem to draw 600w plus in testing. Undervolting should help here.

From my research there is much mention of coil whine, specifically for the ASUS card, the MSI not so much. The MSI seems to have slightly better cooling and at a quieter level.

I’m not looking to rehash the value debate, I have the money to spend and I won’t be feeding the kids baked beans from here on. Well, not based on this alone.

I’m coming from a Zotac 4090 Amp Extreme which has been faultless over the last 2.5 years, but I think for the 5090 gen, these two cards offer better features/performance this time around.

Interested in people’s thoughts.
 
Last edited:
Asus Astral gets my vote as it has better PCB components and better VRM. Out of the two options you wanted, but if being realistic a 5090 FE if you can get one and also going from a 4090 to 5090 for gaming is really a waste of money and time, UNLESS you need the 32GB VRAM for other things then yes worth updating to a 5090 from a 4090.

ASUS


MSI

 
Super similar thermals and performance on both those cards. I'd go with whichever costs less and has a better warranty. I'd stay away from Asus personally due to the reports of RMA fraud on their part.

I will say my Zotac 5090 Solid has been flawless, and runs within spitting distance of those other two models. Not sure if 3-4% faster clocks is worth the extra several hundred clams to you.
 
Thanks for the responses, I must admit the reports of poor RMA experiences with ASUS (more seem to happen in the US?) does lean me more towards MSI this time. But as Purgatory points out the ASUS has plus points around components etc.

I’ve ruled Zotac out this time purely because the Solid isn’t that much cheaper and looks a bit underwhelming, even compared to the Suprim imo.

Is anyone swayed by the pin monitoring on the ASUS card?
 
Last edited:
I forgot to even mention that, that also in my book makes it the safer and better card thanks to these silly new connectors. Really the Astral is the no-brainer out of the two.
Zotac has a monitor on the plug itself. Also 5-year warranty... ;)

That said, for same price I'd definitely take the Astral or Suprim for the bigger HS and resale value will likely be better.
 
I also have the zotac solid, no complaints on the performance but completely agree on looks.
 
Back
Top Bottom