I'm finally buying a graphics card. I have limped by on integrated graphics since last July, but my computer is struggling a bit since I bought my second monitor.
My current rig:
i5-3450 @ 3.7GHz, 8GB 1600MHz, Gigabyte GA-Z77-D3H, Mid-Tower case, 500W PSU and 2x1080p 24" monitors.
Needs/uses:
Smooth operation of 2x1080p monitors for watching 1080p video on one whilst sometimes doing other tasks on the other. Single monitor gaming (KSP, but not much else atm). I don't play many games, and if I do they'll not be very demanding - mostly oldies on sale on Steam (so far Assassin's Creed 1, Tropico and Portal).
I will happily overclock, as I did the CPU and RAM, but I have an eye on keeping the temperatures down too.
Budget:
I don't want to disclose a budget, as I do not want to be recommended the best card at the top of my range. Instead I hope that you will recommend the card best suited to my requirements without it being excessive. I am happy to go with either strategy of buying a more expensive card now to last me ~4 years, or to buy a less expensive card now and upgrade to another less expensive, but more powerful and more efficient card in 2-3 years for about the same total cost. (The latter might be better suited as my current demands are not too great)
Research so far:
It appears that most of the AMD range is priced linearly with respect to performance, according to numerous non-synthetic benchmarks, with a premium growing exponentially towards the top end.
Nvidia cards are slightly more expensive for the performance, but are more efficient, so run cooler. (Is this correct?)
Questions:
How much can Radeons normally undervolt? Would this negate the efficiency advantage that Nvidia has?
Will there be a significant benefit from the next-gen cards from Nvidia or AMD, especially the 20nm process, making them worth the wait?
Thanks, Overclockers.
1404
My current rig:
i5-3450 @ 3.7GHz, 8GB 1600MHz, Gigabyte GA-Z77-D3H, Mid-Tower case, 500W PSU and 2x1080p 24" monitors.
Needs/uses:
Smooth operation of 2x1080p monitors for watching 1080p video on one whilst sometimes doing other tasks on the other. Single monitor gaming (KSP, but not much else atm). I don't play many games, and if I do they'll not be very demanding - mostly oldies on sale on Steam (so far Assassin's Creed 1, Tropico and Portal).
I will happily overclock, as I did the CPU and RAM, but I have an eye on keeping the temperatures down too.
Budget:
I don't want to disclose a budget, as I do not want to be recommended the best card at the top of my range. Instead I hope that you will recommend the card best suited to my requirements without it being excessive. I am happy to go with either strategy of buying a more expensive card now to last me ~4 years, or to buy a less expensive card now and upgrade to another less expensive, but more powerful and more efficient card in 2-3 years for about the same total cost. (The latter might be better suited as my current demands are not too great)
Research so far:
It appears that most of the AMD range is priced linearly with respect to performance, according to numerous non-synthetic benchmarks, with a premium growing exponentially towards the top end.
Nvidia cards are slightly more expensive for the performance, but are more efficient, so run cooler. (Is this correct?)
Questions:
How much can Radeons normally undervolt? Would this negate the efficiency advantage that Nvidia has?
Will there be a significant benefit from the next-gen cards from Nvidia or AMD, especially the 20nm process, making them worth the wait?
Thanks, Overclockers.
1404