which one is better oc'd?

littlekates · 2 Feb 2006 at 22:33

1. cpu@2450/mem@204 superPI 1M = 36s
htt 245
multi x10
ht x4
ram div 166

2. cpu@2500/mem@208 superPI 1M = 38s
htt 250
multi x10
ht x4
ram div 166

3. cpu@2498/mem@208 superPI 1M = 39s
htt 263
multi x9.5
ht x4
ram div 166

all 3 has been stability tested with OCCT and superPI 1M

Mrchu_ · 3 Feb 2006 at 01:35

run some 3dmark05 as comparison then test 1 & 2 with sp2004 stability test fo a few hrs to complete.

As super pi is more for ram (ithink)

Defcon5 · 3 Feb 2006 at 09:55

You havent included memory latencies

littlekates · 3 Feb 2006 at 13:21

Defcon5 said:
You havent included memory latencies

mem letency is 2.5-3-3-6 166 divider (CPU-Z)

Defcon5 · 3 Feb 2006 at 13:26

with all the oc's?

If the ram were the same for all the super pi runs, number 2 should be faster than number 1

BS Dave · 3 Feb 2006 at 13:29

littlekates said:
3. cpu@2498/mem@208 superPI 1M = 39s
htt 263
multi x9.5
ht x4
ram div 166

That's an awful score. My old 3200xp at stock was as fast as that.

I assume you had a load of other programs running when you did this. For a fair test of each overclock, you should make sure you have nothing else running in the background before you start.

Defcon5 · 3 Feb 2006 at 13:36

BS Dave said:
That's an awful score. My old 3200xp at stock was as fast as that.

No chance, a barton would have to be at about 2500 with ram at 2 2 2 11 to get under 40 secs

Kesnel · 3 Feb 2006 at 13:39

Defcon5 said:
with all the oc's?

If the ram were the same for all the super pi runs, number 2 should be faster than number 1

Exactly what I was thinking. The Super PI scores are very confusing. :confused:

BS Dave · 3 Feb 2006 at 13:42

I'm sure it was. Maybe my memory is failing me then. :confused:

Was a long time ago. I'll try it again when I can be arsed to fix the backup PC.

I still believe those three times should be closer together though. There's next to no difference in the total overclock. If anything, I'd say the times should be reversed, given the htt is higher each time.

BS Dave · 3 Feb 2006 at 13:44

I'm bad, come to think of it it was more like 42-43 secs.

Martynt74 · 3 Feb 2006 at 13:54

I'd say i'd stick with 3, even though htt matters less its still higher and only 2mhz lower

littlekates · 3 Feb 2006 at 14:10

i've manage to droped the PI down to 35s using letency 2.5-3-3-5 while playing around with A64Tweaker. cpu currently@2530/ram@211 (253x10) mem still 166 divider 1T, Ht x3. cpu idle 31C*

BS Dave · 3 Feb 2006 at 14:22

nice work.

my SD only does about 33 secs