I was always under the impression that the HR-01 plus was designed to be passive, and surpasses the TRUE when run passive. However, when fans are attached, the TRUE significantly outperforms it with a hot processor. Perhaps I'll find benches of this later, I'm sure comparisons exist. You may well find that the passive one does just as well with cool chips but gets destroyed by the true when sat on something hot
Not specifically - the HR-01 Plus is design to be low airflow & quiet. It can be passive (if you aren't demanding and have sufficient case airflow) or if you use a fan duct to link it into your exhaust fan.
But by fitting a quiet, low airflow fan, you have an almost-quiet solution that can almost-cool as well as the TRUE.
And although in theory the TRUE can be passive, it's a quick way to kill hot CPUs.
If you follow the SPCR link in my previous post, you will see a direct comparison between the TRUE and HR-01 Plus at 12/9/7/5v - The HR-01 Plus almost keeps up at full tilt, but as soon as you lower the airflow, the TRUE performance drops radically.
For a frame of reference, PC Probe reports my CPU at stock as around 24C. If I o/c to 3GHz (nothing special for a Q6600) the temp increases to early 30s. If I go beyond that, my mobo (NB) gets too hot long before PC Probe reports the CPU going above 45C.
OK, it's a subjective indicator, but it demonstrates my point - if I were going to push 3.6GHz, I'd get better performance out of a TRUE, but then again, you need a 120mm fan at full tilt to cool the northbridge and the RAM. And it would be very noisy.
Don't take my work for it - read the SPCR review and look at the comparisons.