Which SSD would you choose?

Associate
Joined
3 Mar 2010
Posts
1,183
Location
Staffordshire
I need a new SSD drive and have found the following drives within my budget. I would really appreciate some advice please.

Which do you consider to be best for reliability and speed?
Or would you choose an alternative?

1. Samsung 250GB 840 Series SSD
2. Crucial 240GB M500 SSD
3. SanDisk 240GB Extreme SSD
4. Intel 180GB 520 Series SSD - OEM
5. Intel 180GB 335 Series SSD
6. Corsair 180GB Force Series GS SSD
7. Kingston 240GB HyperX 3K SSD
 
I need a new SSD drive and have found the following drives within my budget. I would really appreciate some advice please.

Which do you consider to be best for reliability and speed?
Or would you choose an alternative?

1. Samsung 250GB 840 Series SSD
2. Crucial 240GB M500 SSD
3. SanDisk 240GB Extreme SSD
4. Intel 180GB 520 Series SSD - OEM
5. Intel 180GB 335 Series SSD
6. Corsair 180GB Force Series GS SSD
7. Kingston 240GB HyperX 3K SSD

I personally believe SF based drives like Intel,corsair,kingston,sandisk are the best ones in terms of reliability and performance. I have all of these in my test lab & in comparison to samsung one which I also own, I always prefer the sandforce one purely because of better performance & reliability which is surely guaranteed.
 
Thanks for the link that was very useful. It has proved that for what I need the standard Samsung will do just fine.:D

Looking at the figures, the SanDisk Extreme 240GB looks like a decent choice. It is slightly faster than the Samsung 840 250GB. However, it has slightly lower capacity, costs a bit more (at the moment) and isn't as big a manufacturer as Samsung.

Crucial SSDs are good too ! ;)

I'd buy the Samsung, but to be fair, the choice is not clear.
 
I don't think that reliability is "guaranteed" on any SSD, and Samsung SSDs do have a good reliability record.

As far as performance is concerned, there isn't much in it between some of the SSDs mentioned.

http://www.ssdreview.com/review/com...cial-m500-480gb-25-inch-mu02,83/reallife.html

Talking about SSD reliability, I can say as SSDs are newer tech, they are surely less reliable than their predecessors-HDD. However, I can assuredly say that the recent series of Intel SSDs are truly reliable in their segment. If I had to choose a SSD in the link shared, I would surely go with the sandisk extreme 240G mainly because of the said factors. Now it costs less too!
 
Talking about SSD reliability, I can say as SSDs are newer tech, they are surely less reliable than their predecessors-HDD. However, I can assuredly say that the recent series of Intel SSDs are truly reliable in their segment. If I had to choose a SSD in the link shared, I would surely go with the sandisk extreme 240G mainly because of the said factors. Now it costs less too!

I this helpful advice, or confusing ?
 
Please let me know what is confusing? Let me clarify if you need. I just had said, from the pricing & performance point of view sandisk extreme 240G is THE choice for anyone who is new to the SSD world.

Talking about SSD reliability, I can say as SSDs are newer tech, they are surely less reliable than their predecessors-HDD. However, I can assuredly say that the recent series of Intel SSDs are truly reliable in their segment. If I had to choose a SSD in the link shared, I would surely go with the sandisk extreme 240G mainly because of the said factors. Now it costs less too!

You say "SSDs are newer tech, surely less reliable than their predecessors-HDD". Well, I'm not so sure, and I don't see that just because a technology is newer, it means it will be less reliable than the technology it replaces. For what it's worth, I would think that SSDs are generally more reliable than HDDs, as they have no moving parts. Maybe someone from OCUK could give us some real world comparisons for return rates on SSDs vs HDDs. I`ve supplied and installed about 30 SSDs in the last 2 - 3 years, and not had a failure yet. In that time I have encountered at least a couple of faulty HDDs. Not conclusive proof, but I suspect that SSDs are as, if not more reliable than HDDs.

You also stated that Intel SSDs are "truly reliable in their segment", but went on to recommend the SanDisk. And you say that the Sandisk "costs less too!", but costs less than what ? As far as I am aware, it may now cost less that it used to, but does it cost less than say, the Samsung 840 250GB ? The Samsung is currently around £20 cheaper than the SanDisk, and has an extra 10GB capacity. Performance wise, I doubt there's any noticeable difference (see the link to benchmarks I posted previously).

This seemed a bit confusing to me. To say that the SanDisk Extreme 240GB is THE choice for anyone new to SSDs is a bit of a bold claim. I wouldn't deny that it seems a decent choice, but I'd argue that the Samsung 840 250GB, costing about £20 less, having a little more capacity, and being designed and manufactured exclusively by Samsung prevents the SanDisk being THE choice.
 
Last edited:
Guys, I'm not for/against anyone/any brand here.
I am sorry if my earlier statement created confusions which I can try to clarify for sure! I just intend to share my personal experience on SSDs here. In simple terms, I had meant SSDs need more time to stabilize as the environment in which they will be embedded is quite complex. which does not mean all of these will be less reliable but talking generically there can be few reliability issues which is understantable.
Dervious, earlier you had also stated that the SSDs aren't reliable but in your last statement you have reversed this!
Talking about price and recommending SandDisk Extreme 240GB, on the day I had checked this was priced lesser than the samsung one. I had mentioned THE choice as I had got so excited after using this product. I do not have any time for any discussions which get targetted or go wrong way. Friends, I just love sharing my true experiences here!
 
Guys, I'm not for/against anyone/any brand here.
I am sorry if my earlier statement created confusions which I can try to clarify for sure! I just intend to share my personal experience on SSDs here. In simple terms, I had meant SSDs need more time to stabilize as the environment in which they will be embedded is quite complex. which does not mean all of these will be less reliable but talking generically there can be few reliability issues which is understantable.
Dervious, earlier you had also stated that the SSDs aren't reliable but in your last statement you have reversed this!
Talking about price and recommending SandDisk Extreme 240GB, on the day I had checked this was priced lesser than the samsung one. I had mentioned THE choice as I had got so excited after using this product. I do not have any time for any discussions which get targetted or go wrong way. Friends, I just love sharing my true experiences here!

Thanks for your reply.

Just to make it clear, I didn't state that SSDs aren't reliable, I stated "I don't think that reliability is "guaranteed" on any SSD, and Samsung SSDs do have a good reliability record." in response to your claim that "I always prefer the sandforce one purely because of better performance & reliability which is surely guaranteed."

My personal choice of SSD at the moment is Samsung, in partricular the non-pros. This too is based on personal experience, and also on value for money. I have not tried a SanDisk Extreme SSD, but I'm sure they are perfectly fine. What I have done is look at a few reviews and benchmarking tests, and I'm sure that if I did try a SanDisk Extreme, I would be impressed by it, but probably would find that it performs very similarly to the Samsung and Crucial SSDs that I have installed for customers. Benchmarking may show that one SSD performs slightly better than another one in certain tests, but in other tests it performs slightly worse. All I know is that I`ve installed a fair few Crucial M4s, Samsung 830s and 840 non pros, plus an OCZ Vertex 2 and an Intel X-25 80gb(which I owned and used for 3 years). They all performed well (and the Intel seemed not far behind the newer SSDs in performance). The only problems I`ve had were with my Intel, which had to be replaced after 2.5 years, and the OCZ suffered a "partial failure" after a couple of years which required a firmware upgrade + re-format (but is still working today).

Time will tell, but Samsung SSDs do seem to be reliable (reliable enough for users to feel fairly confident that it won't fail - although backups of importnant data should always be made, no matter what the storage media), I doubt they are 100% reliable, but I reckon they are well made and probably won't have the reliability problems that earlier OCZ SSDs seemed to suffer from. And I expect the SanDisk SSDs will also be fairly reliable. I do hope that justintime2001 has found something helpful in our advice, and has now got, or is going to get an SSD. Proabably the best single upgrade for a PC or a laptop.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom