Who would win in a fight?

in fairness... william wallace was an actual person so he's bound to win a google fight. and in reality maximus would win by a MILE.. the only reason people are saying otherwise is because they've some celtic allegience.

B@Th*nG
 
B@Th*nG said:
in fairness... william wallace was an actual person so he's bound to win a google fight. and in reality maximus would win by a MILE.. the only reason people are saying otherwise is because they've some celtic allegience.

B@Th*nG
Click to expand...
Bah, no one can REALLY say for sure. It would be a dirty street fight. The winner will be the first one to kick the other in the crown jewels.
 
Depends. If Wallace can keep him at greatsword range, then Maximus' gladius just won't be long enough to reach Bill.

If Maximus can get inside the effective range of the greatsword however, then the short stabbing blade of the gladius is a far more effective weapon at that range.

The Scottish blades (c.30-40") are more designed for an open battle with more room around the combatants so that slashes and cuts are used more often, and blade length is more useful. The Roman gladius (c.20") is more for in the press of battle where you don't have room to swing a large sword, and stabbing from behind a large shield is a much more effective way of fighting.

So in a one-on-one situation, assuming equal skill, my money would be on William Wallace.
 
cavemanoc said:
Yeah - but Maximus comes with a war dog! Wallace wouldn't see that coming and then Bam - teeth meet crotch :eek:
Click to expand...
Ah, but Wallace has a trained army of killer haggis* - that dog wouldn't know what bit him! :p ;)





* a bit like tribbles on legs :D
 
M0T said:
Maximus would destroy wallace.

Maximus is a battle hardened general in the roman army and wallace is wearing a skirt...
Click to expand...


Yep Wallace also wears make up when he fights aswell

Complete girl :D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom