Why am I not losing weight?

The best solution is just not to have such a calorie deficit in the first place. Eat good healthy nutritious meals and aim for a very slight negative calorie balance.

Your NEAT can go down even with a mild deficit... which can then become not a deficit and your weight will maintain, so it's not a guaranteed solution. It's the same when trying to gain weight; you can try and think you're clever only eating a small surplus so fat gain will be minimised but between NEAT going up (which goes back to the body and homeostasis) and an increase in training volume/intensity, your surplus can easily be wiped out.

Speed of dieting/weight-loss depends how lean you are at the start (leaner people need to diet more slowly to avoid loss of fat-free mass) and how much you have to lose. I'd rather diet hard for 8 weeks than more moderately for 16 because that's 8 weeks I could spend trying to grow/get stronger but I have good willpower when it comes to hunger and dietary adherence. Some people do much better taking a slow approach because they fall off the wagon less, but then you need patience because it's going to take that much longer. Horses for courses.

It also depends on how active you are - if you're sedentary outside of the gym often you have no choice but to diet on low calories to see results, where as a lovely indirect bonus of having an active lifestyle is getting to eat more food whatever you're trying to achieve.
 
Thanks for the advice guys. I don't really want to spend more time in the gym than I already do (9 hours/week) so I can't increase my cardio. I have football training on Tuesday evenings and play 11s on Saturdays so I'm already doing cardio 5 times a week.

Maybe because I'm taking creatine I have more water retention thus body weight? Anyway I'll try cutting my calories to 1000/1400 to increase my deficit.

Don't do cardio in the gym. Instead of wasting that time driving to the gym you can spend hat running and cycling.


Cutting your calories further us a terrible idea.

To put things in perspective I do about 10 hours of cardio a week and can eat around 3000-3500 calories a day and maintain 64kg, I'm 5ft9. You are starving yourself which is forcing your body to minimise energy expenditure and maximise any possible storage of glycogen.


Increase your calories to 2000a day and see what hapowbs
 
You really shouldn't be eating so few calories. I don't know quite what your intake would be to maintain but I assume about 2200. There comes a point where your body just rebels if it isn't getting enough calories and you are punishing it with a large amount of physical exercise.

Your body also adapts to the exercises you are doing. If you are running and cycling the same distance and not improving your time / working super hard each time you will become more efficient and the benefit will diminish.

I would up your calories to closer to 2000 and try and shock your system with some different exercise. What weights are you doing? Deadlifts etc?
 
Why do so many people weigh so little?

I'm so confused.

I'm 4 inches shorter than the OP and 25kg heavier if it makes you feel better.

Thanks for the advice guys. I don't really want to spend more time in the gym than I already do (9 hours/week) so I can't increase my cardio. I have football training on Tuesday evenings and play 11s on Saturdays so I'm already doing cardio 5 times a week.

Maybe because I'm taking creatine I have more water retention thus body weight? Anyway I'll try cutting my calories to 1000/1400 to increase my deficit.

No, just no. You're setting yourself up on a one way ticket to both feeling and looking ****.
 
Your protein bars and shakes. Are they basic protein or full of sugar and chemicals?

Doesn't matter if they're full of dust or rats droppings for the purposes of energy in/out :p

This. I'm 175cm (5ft 9) and I weigh 81kg and in here I'm finding people weighing 15kg less than me or slightly taller looking to weigh less than me and I thought I was pretty average :confused:

I weigh less than you now (77kg~) and am an inch taller. It's always surprising how much comes off when really dropping bodyfat.
 
So I'd live a full and happy life on 2000 calories of sugar only a day?

You may not be happy but you'd be roughly the same weight you would be if you survived on 2000 calories of fat alone or 2000 calories of a varied diet (This obviously doesn't apply to the odd person who breaks the laws of thermodynamics, before we end up in that conversation again)
 
This. I'm 175cm (5ft 9) and I weigh 81kg and in here I'm finding people weighing 15kg less than me or slightly taller looking to weigh less than me and I thought I was pretty average :confused:

I weight 83kg and I'm 6'2". I have a low body fat percentage and quite a lot of lean muscle. Either you are pretty beefy or you have a fair % of fat.
 
You may not be happy but you'd be roughly the same weight you would be if you survived on 2000 calories of fat alone or 2000 calories of a varied diet (This obviously doesn't apply to the odd person who breaks the laws of thermodynamics, before we end up in that conversation again)


But what about the sugar? Which was the question?

What I'm getting at is quite a lot of so called protein bars and protein shakes are on par with sugar quantities of sweets and cakes.
 
But what about the sugar? Which was the question?

What I'm getting at is quite a lot of so called protein bars and protein shakes are on par with sugar quantities of sweets and cakes.

As long as he's taking the overall calories provided by the bar into account it doesn't really matter, like I said earlier in the thread I'd be more worried by the almost total lack of fat.
 
But what about the sugar? Which was the question?

What I'm getting at is quite a lot of so called protein bars and protein shakes are on par with sugar quantities of sweets and cakes.


Yes but the sugar in a protein bar is complimented by the fats and protein also in it. If you eat 300 cals of sweets, you're hitting 100% sugar. If you're hitting 300cals of protein bar, you're likely getting 18g of protein, 8g of fat and the rest carbs/sugar. I eat My Protein flapjacks that have like 30g of sugar in a 340cal bar. But also 20g of protein. Awesome post workout snack.

Sugar in itself isn't bad at all and serves a fantastic purpose for short boosts of fuel or replenishing energy levels post workout.
 
Completely depends on the manufacturer. CNP bars can be high in sugar compared to some, yet the protein content is still adequate. Same with the flapjack bars I get from My a Protein.

As cliched as it sounds, as long as it fits your macros, there's not much of a problem. To echo myself, nothing wrong with sugar. And personally, I stick to sugar post workout, but many will say it can fit in to your diet at any point, as long as your macros are maintained.
 
Back
Top Bottom