What I don't get is the carers get paid minimum to low wages yet the care homes charge an obscene amount of money.
got to keep those tory share holder donors well greased.
What I don't get is the carers get paid minimum to low wages yet the care homes charge an obscene amount of money.
it's probably the benefit with the most fraud.The government has been treating carers as a joke for decades, IIRC there have been calls for them to be better compensated/looked after or at least recognised for what they do for 25+ years in much better times than now.
The difference is that with covid a lot of the clubs and facilities that helped ease the burden of the family carers have gone.
I think our disability benefits are pretty good tbhit's probably the benefit with the most fraud.
2 people on disability benefits can claim carers allowance for each other even if they live together. (unless they changed it)
loads of people likely claim it but don't actually care for the person and just want an excuse to not have to look for a job
our benefits are crap though we are always told they are soo good and that's why all the immigrants come here for benefits but it's utter drivel, most European benefits are way higher these days.
anyone who thinks inflation ain't mental since brexit crap needs to compare their old receipts, it's like a struggle to see anything as cheap as a quid in a supermarket these days, the cost of surviving must have gone up loads but benefits barely ever moved since the 2000s
you assume anyone with a disability can actually get them, loads of people are on ESA but should be on pip but toriesI think our disability benefits are pretty good tbh
I’ve recently applied for UC. I was on ESA. I am still on it, but they are bumping me up with UC as well, so I get the £80 a month uplift. It remains to be seen whether the tories are pressured enough in September to keep the uplift.you assume anyone with a disability can actually get them, loads of people are on ESA but should be on pip but tories
our actual disability benefits are way to generous.
ESA+PIP+carers is crazy cash
the thing is most people with hidden disabilities can't get PIP or it's an insane fight for them to try and ESA is barely above job seekers, I think it's meant to be worse than being on UC since the £20 uplift UC got during covid
I don’t know if you get it, but if so, how often are you reassessed? With me, they gave me 5 years.Disability benefits are ok, if you can get PIP but its difficult and they keep reassessing you,
Most people are 2-3 years, I know a few people who've got conditions that have been going on for ~20 years and are basically expected to be for life short of major breakthroughs, they still get reassessed every year or two.I don’t know if you get it, but if so, how often are you reassessed? With me, they gave me 5 years.
I realise it can be very problematic and even traumatic to get it, but my actual argument was that Arknor was saying the disability benefits are way too generous. I asked him why he thinks that, but have yet to get an answer to my question.Most people are 2-3 years, I know a few people who've got conditions that have been going on for ~20 years and are basically expected to be for life short of major breakthroughs, they still get reassessed every year or two.
Five years is pretty rare, especially if you've only been claiming for a few years, my mother was on DLA from 40ish to her 70's and had to do the DLA reassessments every 2-3 years despite her problem being permanent due to a problem she was born with, and the early attempts to correct it not lasting (she had multiple hip replacements, and for the last 20 years IIRC one of the important muscles had gone due to damage from the ops).
At one point she did have it "for life", until they did a "random reassessment"* and couldn't read their own doctor's report - it wasn't until the appeal panel (after 18 months without it) that anyone on their side looked at any of the evidence, or their own doctors report which when we got the original papers through said "Mrs X Cannot possibly walk..." but the DWP had put down as the basis of the decisions as "the Doctors report says Mrs X can walk".
When my mother's GP and consultant saw the replies to the letters they'd submitted as evidence they were not happy that they'd been been ignored it was a very clear cut case. I believe her GP was willing to do an official complaint against the assessing doctor at one point because he couldn't understand how any qualified doctor could write that someone with my mum's problems could walk (when all we knew was what the DWP had claimed the doctor had written).
As I've seen said many times from many people who deal with DLA/PIP cases on a regular basis, the idea is to make it as hard and dispiriting as possible to claim, not so that you can cut fraud (it's extremely low), but so you can make people with genuine cases give up because often they're struggling on a day to day basis, even before you give them 30 days to fill in a form that requires you to know exactly what it means, and is designed to be a "computer says no" as much as possible (so you can end up writing several pages of additional information because the questions are yes/no/sometimes - please explain). IIRC something like 80-90% of claims that are followed through and go through the appeals process get awarded after initially being denied.
I've seen the current ESA forms and there are questions that confused me, so I asked a few friends (with PHD's etc, and one was a qualified lawyer) what they thought, and they couldn't understand why it was worded how it was. IIRC there was a question with 3 options, one of which was a "yes i can do it" and the other two both had the same meaning as far as we could work out, just one word different (words that were synonyms for each other), the only explanation we could come up with was that the wording had some very specific meaning within the DWP that was different to any other usage.
*We think one of the the neighbours got upset that she had a Motability car as IIRC there was a "random check" for something else, then the DLA reassessment.
Caring for relatives. My mum is getting pretty bad depression. And has been at both my sisters. I'm absolutely dreading doing it. I find it absolutely exhausting. It's why I don't want kids. I'd never want to pass that on. People having to hold down a job, look after thier kids and older relatives?
Seems a pretty miserable time.
Where if you're unlucky soon as you get yourself on your feet you can end up caring for someone.
And the help carers get is terrible. It's more than a full time job. Way more. Mentally and physically. You also are often just watching that person deteriorate.
Just horrible.
Sure you aren't depressed because kids literally bring so much joy to most normal folks lives they would be at a loss to feel the same highs as experiences with their children.
If you are so worried about being a burden on them there is insurance available to protect against that and even assisted suicide is legal in some countries if you so wish.
Your logic is that don't want to play football in case I break my leg.
I don't have the mental energy, I'm not very organised, my partner has physical difficulties, I've never liked kids, and I don't want to do more damage to the environment. Our wages are OK as single. But not with kids, certainly wouldn't have the nice little house we have. I don't really like kids. Most people seem to moan about their kids day to day. I have very time consuming hobbies I'd have to give up.
There are so many reasons against. I absolutely know I'd regret it. It's totally not like sports injuries. A sport injury isn't planned. And you usually recover.
If kids doesn't work out I'd be resentful for 18 plus years, and you can't just change your mind.
LHA (local housing allowance) in Torbay hasn't changed for years, single over 25 adult is still only allowed ~£95 a week towards rent, yet the cost of 1 room place has increased to well over £150 a week, even a bedsit is well over £110 a week now in most areas.
You might be able to find a shed or a s*** hole that fits in that £95 a week, but I very much doubt it would be legally inhabitable.