Why doesn't the western media reoprt this??

AJUK · 28 Nov 2006 at 09:00

Whilst on the subject of probing, why is it that aliens seem to travel across the vast reaches of space and when they get here choose to anally probe a redneck? I mean, they could be a little more choosy in their probees. Perhaps they have a fetish for check shirts, baseball caps and pick-up trucks.

anarchist · 28 Nov 2006 at 09:03

AJUK said:
Whilst on the subject of probing, why is it that aliens seem to travel across the vast reaches of space and when they get here choose to anally probe a redneck? I mean, they could be a little more choosy in their probees. Perhaps they have a fetish for check shirts, baseball caps and pick-up trucks.

Aliens move in mysterious ways... Oops, sorry, wrong fiction genre!

anarchist · 28 Nov 2006 at 09:10

AJUK said:
Whilst on the subject of probing, why is it that aliens seem to travel across the vast reaches of space and when they get here choose to anally probe a redneck?

Speaking of which...

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0349612/

robaylesbury · 28 Nov 2006 at 09:18

anarchist said:
Aliens move in mysterious ways... Oops, sorry, wrong fiction genre!

If these are Catholic aliens you refer to then you're in line for one heck of a probing mate!!

We're talking lighthouse proportions!! We're talking Nelson's column!!

Wouldn't want to be an atheist then!!

Firespark · 29 Nov 2006 at 14:12

As a young teenager I always thougth "wow great Aliens could come to Earth", as an older teenager I read a lot of Sci-Fi and history and then thought, so if these Aliens do come to earth whats to say they will be freindly , actaully if you subscribe to survival of the fittest as universal concept then you better hope like hell they have evolved morally because otherwise they might treat us just as well as say the European settlers did the American Indians.

squiffy · 29 Nov 2006 at 14:24

actaully if you subscribe to survival of the fittest as universal concept then you better hope like hell they have evolved morally because otherwise they might treat us just as well as say the European settlers did the American Indians.

I would think the difference between us and aliens would be similar to ourselves and monkeys. They'll be so different and evolved they'll probably find it difficult to communicate with us.

robaylesbury · 29 Nov 2006 at 14:41

squiffy said:
I would think the difference between us and aliens would be similar to ourselves and monkeys. They'll be so different and evolved they'll probably find it difficult to communicate with us.

Don't worry, I'm sure they'll bring a babel fish to translate everything

ritcH · 3 Dec 2006 at 18:04

I'm not commenting on the India Daily - aliens are here to save us article - but UFOs definitely exist. Here are two articles called UFO Ignorance Parts 1 and 2 which I found interesting and also in alignment with stuff I have read and watched about the perception of UFO's in the mid 20th Century.

http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/viewArticle.asp?articleID=16443 (11th Nov 2006)

http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/viewArticle.asp?articleID=16444 (11th Nov 2006)

This website is also interesting, http://www.nickpope.net/index.html it's about a guy who still works for the MOD but who used to work in their UFO division.

KNiVES · 3 Dec 2006 at 18:11

I had tea with an alien the other day. They're quite charming people, actually

clv101 · 3 Dec 2006 at 18:15

Skunkworks said:
After all, isn't that exactly what we do on Earth with wild animals? Watch them, examine them, place trackers on them to understand their movements?

No, we kill them, hunt them to extinction, exploit their environments - we certainly don't benevolently watch them.

Glaucus · 3 Dec 2006 at 20:08

magick said:
So are all the people and journalists that write for indiadaily 'nutters' then? Indiadaily doesn't seem much like a conspiracy site to me. I think some of the responses I've had to this thread goes to show how closed minded and conditioned some people are in the west.

If you have an hour spare you might want to check out this video of talk given by chuck missler http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4671494071289319646

Here he goes into cover-ups and disinformation and also his own experience working on classified military projects and how the whole UFO topic is so sensitive in the US, that several past US presidents (including Bill Clinton) that asked for all the information on UFO&ETs were refused point-blank by the military.

wasn't he part of the American air force or something?

who is now making lots of money selling books and doing speeches, not really unbiased at all. Also aliens are excellent cover up story's for testing next gen/experimental aircraft. You just have to look at the nighthawk to see how many sightings of it was reported as ufo/aliens and then when it was brought into service everyone seem to just forget about the ufo sightings.

Yes there's UFO (unidentified flying objects) but most are man made and *** rest are natural phanomina. I've never seen any evidance to suggest they are extraterrestrial, apart from we can't explain the sightings.

As for that report it's rubbish, they have technology to shut down all of are technology even a runaway nuclear explosion remotely, that's just BS it can't be done and where the evidance to support these claims.

magick · 3 Dec 2006 at 20:28

AcidHell2 said:
As for that report it's rubbish, they have technology to shut down all of are technology even a runaway nuclear explosion remotely, that's just BS it can't be done and where the evidance to support these claims.

Yes it can be done. At the quantum level of reality the only thing that differentiaites one object from another is the sturcture of atoms (or is it electrons?). By re-arranging the structure of particles and elcetrons you can disable any weapons system. We don't have the know-how to do this ourselves but it is theoreticaly possible.

EDIT

it has also been documented during the cold war both the russians and the americans had there nuclear missiles remotely disbaled. though thats very hush hush ;-)

fini · 3 Dec 2006 at 20:37

magick said:
it has also been documented during the cold war both the russians and the americans had there nuclear missiles remotely disbaled.

though thats very hush hush

You do realise those sentences make no sense together? Either it's documented and you can link me to the document and thus it's out in the open or it's 'hush hush' and you only know because elvis told you.

Additionally, how exactly would a sub have its nuclear missiles remotely disabled? You can't exactly hack into something in the middle of the Atlantic several leagues down that practically nobody knows is even there...

fini

Zefan · 3 Dec 2006 at 20:37

Shut up and take your stupid threads out of this forum. This isn't even fit for GD.

I think four should do it.

Please take the hint and stop posting about ridiculous topics.

iraiguana · 3 Dec 2006 at 20:47

magick said:
Yes it can be done. At the quantum level of reality the only thing that differentiates one object from another is the structure of atoms (or is it electrons?). By re-arranging the structure of particles and electrons you can disable any weapons system. We don't have the know-how to do this ourselves but it is theoretically possible.

I am very sorry it would take the sub atomic rearrangement of atoms to make this change. you have absolutely no idea how much energy this would take and to contain it would be laughable. The sun is nothing compared to what you are suggesting can occur.

Ok I take some of it back and maybe at some point we could perform alchemy which is what you are suggesting, But I doubt anyone who could do would just switch everything back to the way it was after. what would be the point if you could do that, just disable all forms of radioactive material! Why "save us" then let us try again? what would be the point?? there is none so its all lies lies and lies.

Why would anyone spend thousands of generations (light speed limits this) travelling the universe to mind **** a lower intelligence alien. A far more logical thing to do would be to communicate with the lower intelligence and assist in their development eg help with starving nations and eliminate disease etc etc.

magick · 3 Dec 2006 at 21:02

fini said:
You do realise those sentences make no sense together? Either it's documented and you can link me to the document and thus it's out in the open or it's 'hush hush' and you only know because elvis told you.

Additionally, how exactly would a sub have its nuclear missiles remotely disabled? You can't exactly hack into something in the middle of the Atlantic several leagues down that practically nobody knows is even there...

fini

I don't have the exact links myself but here is someone that does :- http://www.consciousmedianetwork.com/members/sbassett.htm

magick · 3 Dec 2006 at 21:05

iraiguana said:
I am very sorry it would take the sub atomic rearrangement of atoms to make this change. you have absolutely no idea how much energy this would take and to contain it would be laughable. The sun is nothing compared to what you are suggesting can occur.

Ok I take some of it back and maybe at some point we could perform alchemy which is what you are suggesting, But I doubt anyone who could do would just switch everything back to the way it was after. what would be the point if you could do that, just disable all forms of radioactive material! Why "save us" then let us try again? what would be the point?? there is none so its all lies lies and lies.

I don't claim to know all the answers and how feasbly it is technicaly but don't assume we know all the is about the manipulation of reality and the physical world. not to long ago if someone said the world was round it would have been wrote off as improbable and "all lies lies and lies".

Zefan · 3 Dec 2006 at 21:12

magick · 3 Dec 2006 at 21:18

Zefan said:

zefan if you don't like what I post don't read it.

Glaucus · 3 Dec 2006 at 21:27

magick said:
Yes it can be done. At the quantum level of reality the only thing that differentiaites one object from another is the sturcture of atoms (or is it electrons?). By re-arranging the structure of particles and elcetrons you can disable any weapons system. We don't have the know-how to do this ourselves but it is theoreticaly possible.

EDIT

it has also been documented during the cold war both the russians and the americans had there nuclear missiles remotely disbaled. though thats very hush hush

But where not just talking about the delivery system, those articles say anything, which suggests they could shut down a nuke taht has been triggered. That would require mopping up vast amounts of electrons within the plutonium, this can not be done remotely.