Apes and Monkeys are descendants of Humans, people eat those and are perfectly fine. Where is your evidence?
wut?
Apes and Monkeys are descendants of Humans, people eat those and are perfectly fine. Where is your evidence?
Alive. That was a true story too. I think it was the Uruguayan rugby team or something. Some of the survivors met those Chilean miners when they were rescued from that collapsed mine.
Also, I don't think cannibalism is actually a crime in this country.
You wouldn't really want to eat something or someone that has just died randomly or been in an accident.
So to get the meat you'd have to kill someone, i guess that's were it gets morally wrong.
I would imagine that if it was remotely legal/acceptable/not completely and utterly just wrong, we would have people killing for the act of food.
How would cannabis be morally wrong?? Is drinking wine morally wrong??
stupid thread.
Atheists are always telling me as long as two homosexuals are consenting then homosexuality itself is not wrong. I thought very well, and brought to their attention the case of Armin Meiwes. He ate someone who consented to being ate. Yet Armin Meiwes was arrested and sentenced to life imprisonment. I have asked the atheists numerous times to tell me why such an act is wrong if they were both consenting yet I've never heard one give me a good reason why. I can say it's truly wrong from my perspective, but atheists can certainly not, and that is a dangerous viewpoint.
I think it is wrong because there is no good condiments to go with it..it's very unexplored territory.
Was just thinking, why is cannibalism actually morally wrong?
Stop thinking.
Op's mother begged me to eat her.
Atheists are always telling me as long as two homosexuals are consenting then homosexuality itself is not wrong. I thought very well, and brought to their attention the case of Armin Meiwes. He ate someone who consented to being ate. Yet Armin Meiwes was arrested and sentenced to life imprisonment. I have asked the atheists numerous times to tell me why such an act is wrong if they were both consenting yet I've never heard one give me a good reason why. I can say it's truly wrong from my perspective, but atheists can certainly not, and that is a dangerous viewpoint.
Atheists are always telling me as long as two homosexuals are consenting then homosexuality itself is not wrong. I thought very well, and brought to their attention the case of Armin Meiwes. He ate someone who consented to being ate. Yet Armin Meiwes was arrested and sentenced to life imprisonment. I have asked the atheists numerous times to tell me why such an act is wrong if they were both consenting yet I've never heard one give me a good reason why. I can say it's truly wrong from my perspective, but atheists can certainly not, and that is a dangerous viewpoint.
Atheists are always telling me as long as two homosexuals are consenting then homosexuality itself is not wrong. I thought very well, and brought to their attention the case of Armin Meiwes. He ate someone who consented to being ate. Yet Armin Meiwes was arrested and sentenced to life imprisonment. I have asked the atheists numerous times to tell me why such an act is wrong if they were both consenting yet I've never heard one give me a good reason why. I can say it's truly wrong from my perspective, but atheists can certainly not, and that is a dangerous viewpoint.