For years now Futuremark - Madonion, have used a cpu mark in with their graphics tests and to be quite honest it shows haow little the CPU is used during graphics applications with the exception of Photoshop programs which can be both cpu and graphic intensive. But I don't see a CPU photo-intensive test done on 3dmark06. In fact the whole test seems, for all intensive purposes, to be an Ego test and not a fully professional test. What I would like to see coming from Futuremark is an explanation, even if it is on screen, for each test and what it is meant to achieve. So far it is rare that anyone bothers to watch the test because they are either off watching the TV, washing up etc. But since our graphic experience is dictated so much by one uttility shouldn't their tests be brought into the everyday market. Everyone whom owns a pc these day almost always owns a digital camera and plays games and I'll lay odds there are more. Gamers Benchmark should be updated to everyday graphic intensive bechmark.