Will Swansea be able to hang on to Michael Laudrup?

Soldato
Joined
4 Aug 2004
Posts
5,205
What do you think? Lots of talk of Madrid, Barca, Chelsea and Arsenal but he seems to be playing it down. (naturally)

I think if Mourinho doesn't return to Chelsea next season, Abramovich will put in a strong approach for Laudrup. Would he be mad to take the job? Probably..... but money talks and he could actually do very well there.
 
He'll stay for another year i reckon, He would suit Arsenal down to the ground if Wenger decides to take a back seat role/leaves next year. Who knows!
 
You could potentially have Chelsea, Arsenal, City, Madrid and Barca all looking for a manager at the end of the season though. Maybe those managers will do a merry go round. Bagsy not Rafa will be the cry!! :D
 
Both he and Wenger are contracted until next year and say they will honour their contracts so I could see him taking over at Arsenal in 2014.

Depends a bit what happens with Mourinho of course as obviously he'd rather take the RM job than Arsenal.
 
It wouldn't be the first time we've been bummed by a manager.

I like Laudrup, he's brought an attacking edge and generally tells it like it is. Like every manager though he's made questionable decisions and some of the players he's brought in / got on loan have been duds (most noticeably Itay Schecter).

That said, he's got a job for life there if he wants it. Our fans are generally welcoming and the only thing he could do to get the boot is get relegated.

As long as 'Arry and Rafa keep away I'll be happy.
 
I don't see why not, I suspect any 'bigger club' than Swansea will want to see how he does in the Europa League next season and over a period of 2-3yrs.

Swansea have a very good team and are certainly more than capable of winning the league cup, he deserves credit but it's hardly the stuff of miracles considering Bradford made it to the final.

He's made some good signings (no doubt his name helped) but for the most part Swansea are as good as they were last season under Rodgers.
 
Last edited:
I have no idea if he'd be good at Arsenal, or anywhere else, managers like players, can have a great season, one great season as a manager, Jewel/Ipswich. Need more than a single season to be good or bad. Can he train/organise and get a good defence, or did he just get lucky with those players and previous defensive training. He's improved them offensively, but will a couple years of defensive neglect make them rubbish... these are all things only time will tell.

Wenger inherited a defence, when every trace of the existing defence was gone, Wenger couldn't organise a good replacement to save his life, he benefited from who was there, and what they could do on their own, while his offensive training complemented the already great defence to make for a fantastic team.

Managers are insanely hard to judge because in the vast majority of cases, they are taking over a squad that has already trained for years together, a previous manager can fail because he had a great team but no striker, and a new manager only needs to buy a new striker to "fix" it.

So far Laudrup looks promising as a manager, without question and if he can improve Swansea further next year, and if he can keep the team going well when european fixtures bog down league form, where more rotation is required and keeping more players in form to play well in more competitions, I certainly wouldn't be against giving him a try at Arsenal. If he got lucky in one season with transfers or he can do it every season. Again time will tell.
 
I'd really like to see Laudrup replace Wenger at the end of next season, he's got swansea playing fantastic football.
 
Much as I'd love to see Laudrup stay and build a dynasty at Swansea, as his mentor Cruyff did at Barcelona, I have to be realistic and concede that it's not going to happen. For starters, he's always said that he doesn't intend to be in management in ten years' time.

But I don't think he's going to move to another Premier League club. If there were any PL club he'd consider, it could only be Arsenal or Man U; I can't see him approaching the revolving doors of Chelsea; not when he's had his fingers burned with his Spartak Moscow 'adventure'.

The draw to manage one of Spain's top two, however, would prove to be more compelling. Though he's always maintained that he doesn't want to manage a club where there's constant pressure to win everything, which certainly covers Real and Barca! In Spain, however, he is virtually royalty, and let's face it - Spain's a nicer place to spend one's latter years than good ol' Blighty.

One further sliver of hope that I'm clinging to is that he's not one for management glory-hunting; his playing career has already assured him legendary status. This is in stark contrast to Martinez, Rodgers and all others who have temporarily been at the Swansea helm [with the possible exception of Sousa]. So while he's quietly but fiercely driven to win, he's not desparate to clamber to the top; he's already been to the summit and planted his flag.

In my opinion, he'll stay at Swansea for at least one more year to see what the Europa League brings [he loves his cup competitions, does Michael The Manager], and then see whether Real or Barca can offer him what he wants. All the while, he's 'grooming' Wieghorst at Swansea to take the reins once he leaves.
 
Swansea is another Lyon. It's a very well run club that has managed to change manager several times without it affecting the team's performance.

Pinning their success of Laudrup (or Rogers) is naive.
 
You could potentially have Chelsea, Arsenal, City, Madrid and Barca all looking for a manager at the end of the season though. Maybe those managers will do a merry go round. Bagsy not Rafa will be the cry!! :D

yeah but he would be a fool if he went to chelsea
 
I hope he does stay and I hope Swansea have another successful season. It's refreshing to see a team punching way above their weight. No world beaters, just hard graft, determination and faith in one another.
 
I have no idea if he'd be good at Arsenal, or anywhere else, managers like players, can have a great season, one great season as a manager, Jewel/Ipswich. Need more than a single season to be good or bad. Can he train/organise and get a good defence, or did he just get lucky with those players and previous defensive training. He's improved them offensively, but will a couple years of defensive neglect make them rubbish... these are all things only time will tell.

Wenger inherited a defence, when every trace of the existing defence was gone, Wenger couldn't organise a good replacement to save his life, he benefited from who was there, and what they could do on their own, while his offensive training complemented the already great defence to make for a fantastic team.

Managers are insanely hard to judge because in the vast majority of cases, they are taking over a squad that has already trained for years together, a previous manager can fail because he had a great team but no striker, and a new manager only needs to buy a new striker to "fix" it.

So far Laudrup looks promising as a manager, without question and if he can improve Swansea further next year, and if he can keep the team going well when european fixtures bog down league form, where more rotation is required and keeping more players in form to play well in more competitions, I certainly wouldn't be against giving him a try at Arsenal. If he got lucky in one season with transfers or he can do it every season. Again time will tell.

Sorry, but the bit about Wenger and inheriting a defence is nonsense. From his best ever side "the invincibles", he only inherited Ashley Cole out of his entire back first choice back four. Even then, he was the manager who gave Cole his debut. Sol Campbell, Kolo Toure and Lauren were all brought in by Wenger.
 
Sorry, but the bit about Wenger and inheriting a defence is nonsense. From his best ever side "the invincibles", he only inherited Ashley Cole out of his entire back first choice back four. Even then, he was the manager who gave Cole his debut. Sol Campbell, Kolo Toure and Lauren were all brought in by Wenger.

They all played alongside and with Adams, Keown, they came to Arsenal and had someone OTHER than Wenger telling them what to do, where to be, Adams organised that defence, even when he wasn't in it, those players benefited from every day they trained or played games with Adams and Keown in the team.

Adams played for not far off 20 years, he was the captain for over a dozen years IIRC, he was there for a full season with Campbell/Kolo before he retired, training with the team, teaching them the ropes, Lauren had been with Adams and Cole for 2-3 years, Keown was there for donkeys years.

Wenger did inherit the defence, but the leadership and the training as well, the guy who in training tells his left back and right back where the hell to be. When he retired after the 01/02 season, Campbell, Lauren, Cole, Keown, Gio and Kolo had all played a minimum of one season with him, had trained with him, several of those Keown, Lauren and Cole had multiple seasons with him.

Don't forget that Keown was a top defender and was training with Arsenal at the same time as Adam's as a youngster before he left for several seasons, he was there till, 2004.

By the end of 2006, it was basically Kolo left who had played any serious number of games with Adams or Keown, and how long as the team been going downhill, particularly defensively. Gallas is a top player, and was an awesome partnership along with Terry, but who was the captain.

Arsenal lacked a leading defender, a real captain, and lacked someone to take charge in games and most likely in training. Since Kolo/Gallas left, the team has entirely fallen apart defensively with absolutely zero cohesion, no sense, completely disorganised.

THere is more to a team than a name on the sheet. Adams stops playing at one point, his influence on the team doesn't. The team up till 2004 had serious leadership, immense mental strength, discipline and quality players. By 2006 a huge portion of players who ever played in part of Keown and/or Adams defence were gone. The continuing year on year drop in quality defensively is clear as day, and when it started was particularly obvious.


Now, Adams was a player you can't simply expect to replace. But isn't it funny that in the run to a champs league final, Cygan, Senderos, Flamini and Lauren played a huge part?

What do Cygan, Senderos, Lauren and Flamini have in common, are they individually better than Clichy, Gallas, Vermaelen, Sagna, only Lauren was better than Sagna.

The difference is the worse players were part of a better trained, better drilled, better organised defence, players who had played with Keown, Adams, Campbell multiple times. The better players lacked playing with organisation, a leader, or any guidance/tactics/good training.

What is the difference then, groups of better players can't do as well as a rag tag makeshift defence in 04/05 who set champions league defensive records.... Wenger was there the whole time, the players improved but the defence is worse.

Teams are FAR more than the influence of just the CURRENT manager. THe players, the type of players, the leadership and the previous managers work are all part of any current team. Honestly unless you get a Wenger or Fergie and see how the team is donkeys years down the line after they've changed everyone and you can really see a team based purely on that manager, its impossible to say exactly how good any manager is.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom