Of course, if one removes most of the junk cluttering up the 'Metro' screen all that is then left is the programmes on the machine which can be easily arranged into groups. one click on the bottom left of the desktop takes one to the 'Metro' screen and a second click has the program running. It is actually quicker than a start menu.
The "I want the Windows 95 start menu because I'm pro" band wagon is all very strange. Ironically you'd expect technology enthusiasts to actually embrace change and enjoy working out how to get the best from new ideas, not desperately try to cling to a system designed almost 20 years ago... /shrug
The "I want the Windows 95 start menu because I'm pro" band wagon is all very strange. Ironically you'd expect technology enthusiasts to actually embrace change and enjoy working out how to get the best from new ideas, not desperately try to cling to a system designed almost 20 years ago... /shrug
All very well, but the start menu system has been around a long time for a reason - it works well. now it is all fine for me to learn a new system but for anyone deploying computers in a workplace it is quite different - users will either need expensive training or they new a familiar system and Windows 7 is just that. Sure people will have to move on in a few years but by then most workers will have used Windows 8 at home and be familiar with it.
Anyway, Windows 8 still has all the same Start menu folders and uses them to put tiles on the 'Windows * Environment' screen so even Microsoft hasn't got away from so sort of start menu have they?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.